SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:oru-101781"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:oru-101781" > NON-RESPONSE AFTER ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Axer, S.Department of Surgery, Torsby Hospital, Torsby, Sweden (author)

NON-RESPONSE AFTER GASTRIC BYPASS AND SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY - THE THEORETICAL NEED FOR REVISIONAL BARIATRIC SURGERY RESULTS FROM THE SCANDINAVIAN OBESITY SURGERY REGISTRY : Revisional surgery

  • Article/chapterEnglish2022

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Springer,2022
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:oru-101781
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-101781URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:vet swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Background: Revisional surgery is a second-line treatment option after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GBP) in patients with primary or secondary non-response. This study is an analysis of the theoretical need for revisional surgery when applying four indication benchmarks.Objective: The aim was to analyze the risk for primary and secondary non-response after SG and GBP.Setting: 44 hospitals in Sweden.Methods: Based on data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, SG and GBP were compared regarding four endpoints: 1. Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) < 50%; 2. weight regain of more than 10 kg after nadir; 3. fulfillment of IFSO-guidelines; or 4. ADA-criteria for bariatric surgery two years after primary surgery.Results: 60 426 individuals were included in the study (SG: n=7856 and GBP: n=52 570). Compared to patients in the GBP-group, more SG patients failed to achieved a %EWL > 50% (23.0% versus 8.5%, p < .001), regained more than 10 kg after nadir (4.3% versus 2.5%, p < .001), more often fulfilled the IFSO-criteria (8.0% vs. 4.5%, p < .001) or the ADA criteria (3.3% vs. 1.8%, p < 001) for bariatric/metabolic surgery at the 2-year follow-up.Conclusions: SG is associated with a higher risk for primary and secondary non-response compared to gastric bypass. To offer revisional bariatric surgery to all non-responders exceeds the bounds of feasibility and operability. Hence, individual prioritization and intensified evaluation of alternative second-line treatments is necessary.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Szabo, Eva,PhD,1973-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper,Region Örebro län,Department of Surgery(Swepub:oru)eso (author)
  • Näslund, I.Örebro University, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden (author)
  • Department of Surgery, Torsby Hospital, Torsby, SwedenInstitutionen för medicinska vetenskaper (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Obesity Surgery: Springer32:Suppl. 2, s. 381-3810960-89231708-0428

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Axer, S.
Szabo, Eva, PhD, ...
Näslund, I.
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Surgery
Articles in the publication
Obesity Surgery
By the university
Örebro University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view