SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:sh-38511"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:sh-38511" > Systematic reviews ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management : An overview of different methodological options

Macura, B. (author)
Stockholm Environment Institute
Suškevičs, M. (author)
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
Garside, R. (author)
University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK
show more...
Hannes, K. (author)
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Rees, R. (author)
UCL Institute of Education, London, UK
Rodela, Romina, Ph.D. 1975- (author)
Södertörns högskola,Miljövetenskap,Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019-06-13
2019
English.
In: Environmental Evidence. - : BioMed Central. - 2047-2382. ; 8:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Qualitative research related to the human dimensions of conservation and environment is growing in quantity. Rigorous syntheses of such studies can help develop understanding and inform decision-making. They can combine findings from studies in varied or similar contexts to address questions relating to, for example, the lived experience of those affected by environmental phenomena or interventions, or to intervention implementation. Researchers in environmental management have adapted methodology for systematic reviews of quantitative research so as to address questions about the magnitude of intervention effects or the impacts of human activities or exposure. However, guidance for the synthesis of qualitative evidence in this field does not yet exist. The objective of this paper is to present a brief overview of different methods for the synthesis of qualitative research and to explore why and how reviewers might select between these. The paper discusses synthesis methods developed in other fields but applicable to environmental management and policy. These methods include thematic synthesis, framework synthesis, realist synthesis, critical interpretive synthesis and meta-ethnography. We briefly describe each of these approaches, give recommendations for the selection between them, and provide a selection of sources for further reading. © 2019 The Author(s).

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Miljöledning (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Environmental Management (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Critical interpretative synthesis
Framework synthesis
Meta-ethnography
Mixed methods reviews
Qualitative evidence synthesis
Realist synthesis
Thematic synthesis

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Macura, B.
Suškevičs, M.
Garside, R.
Hannes, K.
Rees, R.
Rodela, Romina, ...
About the subject
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING AND ...
and Environmental En ...
and Environmental Ma ...
Articles in the publication
Environmental Ev ...
By the university
Södertörn University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view