SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-155655"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-155655" > We Distort Memories...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

We Distort Memories of Other’s Decisions, and Other’s Decisions Distort Memories of What We Decided

Lindholm, Torun (author)
Stockholms universitet,Personlighets-, social- och utvecklingspsykologi
Memon, Amina (author)
Svenson, Ola (author)
Stockholms universitet,Kognitiv psykologi
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017
2017
English.
  • Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Research shows that after making a decision, people often distort the memory of the decision alternatives towards greater coherence with the chosen alternative. Given the pivotal role of sharing cognitive representations of reality with others, it seems reasonable that such decision consolidation may extend beyond decisions made by the individual him-/herself. The current research explores how people consolidate their own and another person’s decisions. Moreover, we examine how information about another person’s decisions affects an individual’s memory of his/her own decision. In Study 1 we presented participants with a medical case scenario in which one of two patients should be prioritized for surgery. They were given facts about the patients (e.g., probability of surviving surgery), and either decided themselves whom to prioritize, or were told that a physician made the decision. When later reproducing the facts from memory, participants distorted memories of facts to become more supportive both of their own and of the doctor’s choice. Study 2 investigated how feedback of other’s decisions affect people’s memory for their own decisions. Participants decided whether a physician should comply or not to the request of a terminally ill patient who asked for help to committ suicide. After making their decision, participants were informed that a majority or a minority had chosen the same alternative. When the patient was an in-group member participants consolidated their own decision more when receiving minority, rather than majority feedback. This reversed for decisions on out-group member. Results suggest important social psychological motivations and moderators of decision consolidation strategies.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

decision-making
social influences
Psychology
psykologi

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
kon (subject category)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Lindholm, Torun
Memon, Amina
Svenson, Ola
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Psychology
By the university
Stockholm University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view