SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-190690"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-190690" > An Assessment of Ea...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence

Sherwood, S. C. (author)
Webb, M. J. (author)
Annan, J. D. (author)
show more...
Armour, K. C. (author)
Forster, P. M. (author)
Hargreaves, J. C. (author)
Hegerl, G. (author)
Klein, S. A. (author)
Marvel, K. D. (author)
Rohling, E. J. (author)
Watanabe, M. (author)
Andrews, T. (author)
Braconnot, P. (author)
Bretherton, C. S. (author)
Foster, G. L. (author)
Hausfather, Z. (author)
Heydt, A. S. (author)
Knutti, R. (author)
Mauritsen, Thorsten (author)
Stockholms universitet,Meteorologiska institutionen (MISU)
Norris, J. R. (author)
Proistosescu, C. (author)
Rugenstein, M. (author)
Schmidt, G. A. (author)
Tokarska, K. B. (author)
Zelinka, M. D. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2020
2020
English.
In: Reviews of geophysics. - 8755-1209 .- 1944-9208. ; 58:4
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • We assess evidence relevant to Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity per doubling of atmospheric CO2, characterized by an effective sensitivity S. This evidence includes feedback process understanding, the historical climate record, and the paleoclimate record. An S value lower than 2 K is difficult to reconcile with any of the three lines of evidence. The amount of cooling during the Last Glacial Maximum provides strong evidence against values of S greater than 4.5 K. Other lines of evidence in combination also show that this is relatively unlikely. We use a Bayesian approach to produce a probability density function (PDF) for S given all the evidence, including tests of robustness to difficult-to-quantify uncertainties and different priors. The 66% range is 2.6-3.9 K for our Baseline calculation and remains within 2.3-4.5 K under the robustness tests; corresponding 5-95% ranges are 2.3-4.7 K, bounded by 2.0-5.7 K (although such high-confidence ranges should be regarded more cautiously). This indicates a stronger constraint on S than reported in past assessments, by lifting the low end of the range. This narrowing occurs because the three lines of evidence agree and are judged to be largely independent and because of greater confidence in understanding feedback processes and in combining evidence. We identify promising avenues for further narrowing the range in S, in particular using comprehensive models and process understanding to address limitations in the traditional forcing-feedback paradigm for interpreting past changes.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Climate
climate sensitivity
global warming
Bayesian methods

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view