SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-216361"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-216361" > Insurance value of ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Insurance value of biodiversity in the Anthropocene is the full resilience value

Hahn, Thomas, 1964- (author)
Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre
Sioen, Giles B. (author)
Gasparatos, Alexandros (author)
show more...
Elmqvist, Thomas, 1963- (author)
Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre
Brondizio, Eduardo (author)
Gómez-Baggethun, Erik (author)
Folke, Carl (author)
Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre,Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden
Setiawati, Martiwi Diah (author)
Atmaja, Tri (author)
Arini, Enggar Yustisi (author)
Jarzebski, Marcin Pawel (author)
Fukushi, Kensuke (author)
Takeuchi, Kazuhiko (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2023
2023
English.
In: Ecological Economics. - : Elsevier BV. - 0921-8009 .- 1873-6106. ; 208
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Recently two distinctly different conceptualisations of insurance value of biodiversity/ ecosystems have been developed. The ecosystem framing addresses the full resilience value without singling out subjective risk pref-erences. Conversely, the economic framing focuses exactly on this subjective value of risk aversion, implying that the insurance value is zero for risk neutral persons. Here we analyse the differences conceptually and empirically, and relate this to the broader socio-cultural dimensions of social-ecological resilience. The uncertainty of the Anthropocene blurs the distinction between subjective/objective. We show that the economic framing has been operationalised only in specific cases while the broader literature on resilience, disaster risk reduction, and nature-based solutions tend to address the full value of resilience. Yet, the empirical literature that relates to insurance value of biodiversity is hardly consistent with resilience theory because the slow underlying variables defining resilience are rarely addressed. We suggest how the empirical literature on insurance value can be better aligned with resilience theory. Since the ecosystem framing of insurance value captures the essence of the resilience, we propose using the concept resilience value as it may reduce the present ambiguity in terminology and conceptualisation of insurance value of biodiversity.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Insurance value of ecosystems
Natural insurance value
Ecosystem services
General resilience
Specified resilience

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view