SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-55932"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-55932" > The history of the ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

The history of the concept of grammaticalisation

Lindström, Therese, 1976- (author)
University of Sheffield
McMahon, April, Professor (thesis advisor)
University of Edinburgh
Linn, Andrew, Professor (thesis advisor)
University of Sheffield
show more...
Vincent, Nigel, Professor (opponent)
University of Manchester
Steadman Jones, Richard, Dr (opponent)
University of Sheffield
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Sheffield : University of Sheffield, 2004
English 453 s.
  • Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The present thesis discusses the history and meaning of the term and concept called grammaticalisation. Linguists usually ascribe the coinage of the term grammaticalisation to Antoine Meillet (1866-1936), who allegedly played a vital role in the history of grammaticalisation. It is also widely acknowledged that grammaticalisation was in some way 'revived' during the 1970s, and that Talmy Givón had an important role in this, as demonstrated by the popularity of the saying 'Today’s morphology is yesterday’s syntax' (taken from one of his articles). I show that Meillet wrote little about grammaticalisation and that he hardly ever used this word, and possibly did not mean for it to be viewed as a term / label. Moreover, the paper in question (Meillet, 1912) is basically a general introduction to a concept which he sees as a continuation of a notion with a long history. In addition, I prove that there are no clear links between Meillet and Givón’s work in the early 1970s. Despite the general acceptance that Meillet coined grammaticalisation, my thesis proves that it could have been coined more than once, and that it does not always mean the same thing to all users. I show that sometimes the term is accompanied by examples which others have used to illustrate lexicalisation, a term which some employ for a process that is seen as the opposite of grammaticalisation. I therefore advocate careful use of our definitions of terminology and concepts, and insist that we should define our notions, instead of letting examples do the work of illustration and definition. Finally, I question whether it is true that grammaticalisation is unidirectional. I research the history of the view that grammaticalisation is a unidirectional process. Grammatical relations can be expressed by different means – e.g. word order, content words becoming grammatical markers, or parts of words being given a function. I believe all these should be compared, in order to improve our knowledge of how languages change and why. I claim that they all represent sub-processes of a superordinate category which I have labelled supergrammaticalisation.

Subject headings

HUMANIORA  -- Språk och litteratur -- Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Languages and Literature -- General Language Studies and Linguistics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

grammaticalisation
unidirectionaty
lexicalisation
history of linguistics
historical linguistics
grammatikalisering
unidirectionality
lexikalisering
lingvistikens historia
historisk lingvistik
Linguistics
Lingvistik
Linguistics
lingvistik

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
dok (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view