Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-100462" >
Individualized low-...
-
Aasa, BjörnUmeå universitet,Ortopedi,Norrlandsklinikens hälsocentral, Umeå, Sweden,Department of Orthopaedics, Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Norrlandsklinikens hälsocentral, Umeå
(författare)
Individualized low-load motor control exercises and education versus a high-load lifting exercise and education to improve activity, pain intensity, and physical performance in patients with low back pain : a randomized controlled trial
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2015
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT),2015
-
printrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-100462
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-100462URI
-
https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5021DOI
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-8261URI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
Validerad; 2015; Nivå 2; 20150203 (andbra)
-
Study Design Randomized controlled trial. Background Low back pain is a common disorder. Patients with low back pain frequently have aberrant and pain-provocative movement patterns that often are addressed with motor control exercises. Objective To compare the effects of low-load motor control (LMC) exercise and those of a high-load lifting (HLL) exercise. Methods Seventy participants with recurrent low back pain, who were diagnosed with nociceptive mechanical pain as their dominating pain pattern, were randomized to either LMC or HLL exercise treatments. Participants were offered 12 treatment sessions over an 8-week period. All participants were also provided with education regarding pain mechanisms. Methods Participants were assessed prior to and following treatment. The primary outcome measures were activity (the Patient-Specific Functional Scale) and average pain intensity over the last 7 days (visual analog scale). The secondary outcome measure was a physical performance test battery that included 1 strength, 3 endurance, and 7 movement control tests for the lumbopelvic region. Results Both interventions resulted in significant within-group improvements in pain intensity, strength, and endurance. The LMC group showed significantly greater improvement on the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (4.2 points) compared with the HLL group (2.5 points) (P<.001). There were no significant between-group differences in pain intensity (P = .505), strength, and 1 of the 3 endurance tests. However, the LMC group showed an increase (from 2.9 to 5.9) on the movement control test subscale, whereas the HLL group showed no change (from 3.9 to 3.1) (P<.001). Conclusion An LMC intervention may result in superior outcomes in activity, movement control, and muscle endurance compared to an HLL intervention, but not in pain intensity, strength, or endurance.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Berglund, LarsUmeå universitet,Fysioterapi,Ortopedi,Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University(Swepub:umu)labe0004
(författare)
-
Michaelson, PeterLuleå tekniska universitet,Hälsa och rehabilitering(Swepub:ltu)petmic
(författare)
-
Aasa, UlrikaUmeå universitet,Fysioterapi,Umeå University, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation(Swepub:umu)ulaa0001
(författare)
-
Umeå universitetOrtopedi
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy: Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT)45:2, s. 77-850190-60111938-1344
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas