SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-119072"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-119072" > Translating person-...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Translating person-centered care into practice : a comparative analysis of motivational interviewing, illness-integration support, and guided self-determination

Zoffmann, Vibeke (author)
Hörnsten, Åsa, 1963- (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för omvårdnad
Storbaekken, Solveig (author)
show more...
Graue, Marit (author)
Rasmussen, Bodil (author)
Wahl, Astrid (author)
Kirkevold, Marit (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2016
2016
English.
In: Patient Education and Counseling. - : Elsevier. - 0738-3991 .- 1873-5134. ; 99:3, s. 400-407
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objective: Person-centred care [PCC] can engage people in living well with a chronic condition. However, translating PCC into practice is challenging. We aimed to compare the translational potentials of three approaches: motivational interviewing [MI], illness integration support [IIS] and guided self-determination [GSD]. Methods: Comparative analysis included eight components: (1) philosophical origin; (2) development in original clinical setting; (3) theoretical underpinnings; (4) overarching goal and supportive processes; (5) general principles, strategies or tools for engaging peoples; (6) health care professionals' background and training; (7) fidelity assessment; (8) reported effects. Results: Although all approaches promoted autonomous motivation, they differed in other ways. Their original settings explain why IIS and GSD strive for life-illness integration, whereas MI focuses on managing ambivalence. IIS and GSD were based on grounded theories, and MI was intuitively developed. All apply processes and strategies to advance professionals' communication skills and engagement; GSD includes context-specific reflection sheets. All offer training programs; MI and GSD include fidelity tools. Conclusion: Each approach has a primary application: MI, when ambivalence threatens positive change; IIS, when integrating newly diagnosed chronic conditions; and GSD, when problem solving is difficult, or deadlocked. Practice Implications: Professionals must critically consider the context in their choice of approach. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Empowerment
Person-centred care
Chronic illness
Translational research
Self-management
tivational interviewing
Life skills
Illness integration
Guided self-determination
Comparative analysis

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view