SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-144955"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-144955" > The WHO 2016 verbal...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Nichols, Erin K. (author)

The WHO 2016 verbal autopsy instrument : An international standard suitable for automated analysis by InterVA, InSilicoVA, and Tariff 2.0

  • Article/chapterEnglish2018

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2018-01-10
  • PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,2018
  • electronicrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-144955
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-144955URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002486DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:for swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Background: Verbal autopsy (VA) is a practical method for determining probable causes of death at the population level in places where systems for medical certification of cause of death are weak. VA methods suitable for use in routine settings, such as civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, have developed rapidly in the last decade. These developments have been part of a growing global momentum to strengthen CRVS systems in low-income countries. With this momentum have come pressure for continued research and development of VA methods and the need for a single standard VA instrument on which multiple automated diagnostic methods can be developed.Methods and findings: In 2016, partners harmonized a WHO VA standard instrument that fully incorporates the indicators necessary to run currently available automated diagnostic algorithms. The WHO 2016 VA instrument, together with validated approaches to analyzing VA data, offers countries solutions to improving information about patterns of cause-specific mortality. This VA instrument offers the opportunity to harmonize the automated diagnostic algorithms in the future.Conclusions: Despite all improvements in design and technology, VA is only recommended where medical certification of cause of death is not possible. The method can nevertheless provide sufficient information to guide public health priorities in communities in which physician certification of deaths is largely unavailable. The WHO 2016 VA instrument, together with validated approaches to analyzing VA data, offers countries solutions to improving information about patterns of cause-specific mortality.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Byass, PeterUmeå universitet,Epidemiologi och global hälsa,MRC-Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa,Umeå Centre for Global Health Research(Swepub:umu)peby0002 (author)
  • Chandramohan, Daniel (author)
  • Clark, Samuel J. (author)
  • Flaxman, Abraham D. (author)
  • Jakob, Robert (author)
  • Leitao, Jordana (author)
  • Maire, Nicolas (author)
  • Rao, Chalapati (author)
  • Riley, Ian (author)
  • Setel, Philip W. (author)
  • Umeå universitetEpidemiologi och global hälsa (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:PLoS Medicine: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE15:11549-12771549-1676

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view