SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-176274"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-176274" > Sensitivity analysi...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Sensitivity analysis of different quality assurance methods for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy

Adjeiwaah, Mary, 1980- (author)
Umeå universitet,Radiofysik
Garpebring, Anders (author)
Umeå universitet,Radiofysik
Nyholm, Tufve (author)
Umeå universitet,Radiofysik
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2020
2020
English.
In: Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 2405-6316. ; 13, s. 21-27
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background and purpose: There are currently no standard quality assurance (QA) methods for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy (RT). This work was aimed at evaluating the ability of two QA protocols to detect common events that affect quality of MR images under RT settings.Materials and methods: The American College of Radiology (ACR) MRI QA phantom was repeatedly scanned using a flexible coil and action limits for key image quality parameters were derived. Using an exploratory survey, issues that reduce MR image quality were identified. The most commonly occurring events were introduced as provocations to produce MR images with degraded quality. From these images, detection sensitivities of the ACR MRI QA protocol and a commercial geometric accuracy phantom were determined.Results: Machine-specific action limits for key image quality parameters set at mean±3σ" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline-block; line-height: normal; font-size: 16.2px; word-spacing: normal; overflow-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; position: relative;">mean±3σ were comparable with the ACR acceptable values. For the geometric accuracy phantom, provocations from uncorrected gradient nonlinearity effects and a piece of metal in the bore of the scanner resulted in worst distortions of 22.2 mm and 3.4 mm, respectively. The ACR phantom was sensitive to uncorrected signal variations, electric interference and a piece of metal in the bore of the scanner but could not adequately detect individual coil element failures.Conclusions: The ACR MRI QA phantom combined with the large field-of-view commercial geometric accuracy phantom were generally sensitive in identifying some common MR image quality issues. The two protocols when combined may provide a tool to monitor the performance of MRI systems in the radiotherapy environment.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Fysik -- Annan fysik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Physical Sciences -- Other Physics Topics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

MRI in R
TQuality assurance
ACR
Image quality
Sensitivity analysis
Large geometric accuracy phantom
radiofysik
radiation physics

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Adjeiwaah, Mary, ...
Garpebring, Ande ...
Nyholm, Tufve
About the subject
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Physical Science ...
and Other Physics To ...
Articles in the publication
Physics and Imag ...
By the university
Umeå University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view