SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-187652"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-187652" > Radial Access for C...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Radial Access for Coronary Angiography Carries Fewer Complications Compared with Femoral Access : A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Bajraktari, Gani (author)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för medicin,Clinic of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Kosova, Prishtina, Kosovo; Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina “Hasan Prishtina”, Prishtina, Kosovo; UBT College, Prishtina, Kosovo
Rexhaj, Zarife (author)
Elezi, Shpend (author)
show more...
Zhubi-Bakija, Fjolla (author)
Bajraktari, Artan (author)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för medicin,Clinic of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Kosova, Prishtina, Kosovo
Bytyci, Ibadete (author)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för medicin,Clinic of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Kosova, Prishtina, Kosovo
Batalli, Arlind (author)
Henein, Michael Y. (author)
Umeå universitet,Avdelningen för medicin
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-05-17
2021
English.
In: Journal of Clinical Medicine. - : MDPI. - 2077-0383. ; 10:10
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background and Aim: In patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), the benefits associated with radial access compared with the femoral access approach remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the short-term evidence-based clinical outcome of the two approaches. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing radial versus femoral access for CA and PCI. We identified 34 RCTs with 29,352 patients who underwent CA and/or PCI and compared 14,819 patients randomized for radial access with 14,533 who underwent procedures using femoral access. The follow-up period for clinical outcome was 30 days in all studies. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a fixed-effect or a random-effect model, as appropriate. Risk ratios (RRs) were used for efficacy and safety outcomes.Results: Compared with femoral access, the radial access was associated with significantly lower risk for all-cause mortality (RR: 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61 to 0.88; p = 0.001), major bleeding (RR: 0.53; 95% CI:0.43 to 0.65; p ˂ 0.00001), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)(RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.91; p = 0.0002), and major vascular complications (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.48; p ˂ 0.00001). These results were consistent irrespective of the clinical presentation of ACS or STEMI. Conclusions: Radial access in patients undergoing CA with or without PCI is associated with lower mortality, MACE, major bleeding and vascular complications, irrespective of clinical presentation, ACS or STEMI, compared with femoral access.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kardiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

femoral
radial
coronarography
PCI
acute coronary syndrome
stable coronary artery disease

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view