SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-195214"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-195214" > Lost in Paradise

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Van Toorn, Roemer,1960-Architecture Theory (author)

Lost in Paradise

  • Article/chapterEnglish2002

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Rotterdam :NAi Publishers,2002
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-195214
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-195214URI
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-195159URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:kap swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • English/Dutch publicationBook description: Once again this successful annual publication presents a selection of the most memorable Dutch architecture of the past year. In the Architecture in the Netherlands Yearbook 2001-2002 the editors focus in their introductory essays on the new role played by architects and their work in a force field where private parties call the tune and both government and the common good are relegated to the sidelines. There are lavish illustrations and in-depth descriptions of over 30 projects realized in 2001 including work by Claus en Kaan, Jo Coenen, Geurst en Schulze, Xaveer De Geyter, Micha de Haas, John Hejduk, Kruunenberg van den Erve, Mecanoo, Meyer en Van Schooten, MVRDV, UN Studio, Koen van Velsen, and Bolles + Wilson.
  • Also available in Italian
  • People in the Netherlands don’t dream about the Utopia of a heavenly paradise, but are convinced that social-democracy’s Blairite infatuation with the free market, the so-called politics of the ‘third way’, is capable of delivering heaven on earth. For everyone who is party to the success of corporate Holland, the earthly paradise does indeed seem to be manifesting itself. Yet because of the ‘total’ material and psychological freedom, the middle class has lost its way in this paradise. The many recent urban design and architectural projects in the Netherlands bear silent witness to this.The consensus paradise: The secret of this paradise is that all parties, however contradictory their interests, are always prepared to negotiate. Instead of the rough and tumble of ideological viewpoints being played off against one another, bureaucratic intervention ensures that a cosy consensus is reached between the different parties. The disadvantage of this approach is the tendency to defer thorny issues indefinitely. Public responsibilities are thereby ceded by the public administration, leaving private interests holding all the trumps. Whereas in the past the government, as the guardian of public interest, managed to maintain an order of sorts, what we have now is an organized chaos that works in favour of the private sector. Briefly, what this boils down to is that salaries are kept structurally low in the Netherlands in comparison with neighbouring countries, attractive fiscal constructions are invoked for the benefit of (international) companies, the government pays for infrastructure, utilities are privatized without the buyers having to bear the risk associated with less profitable divisions and the government relinquishes much of its control over land-use policy.1 For the last 20 years – during coalitions led by first Ruud Lubbers (Christian Democrat) and then Wim Kok (Labour Party) – consensus politics has been surrounded by an aura of sanctity.Paradoxically, the Netherlands’ cosy consensus culture is attended by a plethora of regulations that would not disgrace a Kafkaesque bureaucracy. To mention just one example: according to the holy writ of the Buildings Decree, every new dwelling in the Netherlands must have an ‘outdoor space’. Architects, however, regard this arbitrary imposition of balconies on the outer wall as a typical example of consensus terrorism. In order to appear to be complying with the Buildings Decree, they put a glazed veranda in the living room. When the occupants open the verandah windows, thus letting outdoor air into this area of the living room, there is legally speaking an outdoor space. Later on, of course, the occupants are canny enough to remove the redundant glazed inner walls in their officially approved dwelling. Instead of reflecting on the meaning of an outdoor space, or devolving responsibility to the architect, the government lays down rules that then have to be circumvented by devious means.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Architecture Theory (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Architecture in The Netherlands 2001/02Rotterdam : NAi Publishers:41797890566225349056622536
  • In:AbitareRotterdam : NAi Publishers:4170001-32182499-3522

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Van Toorn, Roeme ...
About the subject
HUMANITIES
HUMANITIES
and Arts
and Architecture
Articles in the publication
Architecture in ...
Abitare
By the university
Umeå University

Search outside SwePub

Wikipedia about the author:
Roemer_Van_Toorn
Van Toorn, Roemer,1960-
en

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view