SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-40744"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-40744" > Is the test result ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Is the test result correct? A questionnaire study of blood collection practices in primary health care

Söderberg, Johan (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för medicinsk biovetenskap
Wallin, Olof (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för medicinsk biovetenskap
Grankvist, Kjell (author)
Umeå universitet,Klinisk kemi
show more...
Brulin, Christine (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för omvårdnad
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2010-06-14
2010
English.
In: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. - : Blackwell Publishing. - 1356-1294 .- 1365-2753. ; 16:4, s. 707-711
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Rationale, aims and objectives  Venous blood tests are important for clinical decision making. Most errors in blood testing are due to human errors before the blood samples reach the laboratory. The present study was designed to investigate venous blood sampling (VBS) practices in primary health care centres (PHCs) compared with clinical laboratory staff.Method  A cross-sectional survey of 70 PHCs and two clinical laboratories is conducted. All staff responsible for VBS (317 respondents, response rate 94%) completed a questionnaire on VBS practices.Results  Instructions for VBS were not followed in the surveyed PHCs. For example, only 54% reported that they always identified the patient by using name/Swedish identification number and only 5% reported that they always used photo-ID, the two preferred means for patient identification. Only 12% reported that they always released venous stasis as soon as possible. Fewer PHC staff than clinical laboratory staff reported correct VBS practices. For example, 54% of the PHC staff reported that they always identified the patient by name and Swedish identification number, as compared with 95% of the clinical laboratory staff (P < 0.001). Documented VBS routines and re-education in VBS were not clearly associated with reported correct VBS practices.Conclusions  In the surveyed PHCs, there are clinically important risks for misidentification of patients and erroneous test results, with consequences for the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Quality interventions, aimed at improving VBS practices, are needed to ensure patient safety.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Annan klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Other Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)

Keyword

blood specimen collection
medical errors
phlebotomy
primary health care
questionnaires
specimen handling
Clinical chemistry
Klinisk kemi
Clinical Chemistry
klinisk kemi

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Söderberg, Johan
Wallin, Olof
Grankvist, Kjell
Brulin, Christin ...
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Other Clinical M ...
Articles in the publication
Journal of Evalu ...
By the university
Umeå University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view