SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-4445"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-4445" > Structure of joint ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks

Domkin, Dmitry (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,Umeå universitet,Idrottsmedicin,Belastningsskadecentrum
Laczko, Jozsef (author)
Department of Biomechanics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Jaric, Slobodan (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,Belastningsskadecentrum
show more...
Johansson, Håkan (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,Belastningsskadecentrum
Latash, Mark (author)
Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvanaia State University, University Park, USA
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2001-12-11
2002
English.
In: Experimental Brain Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0014-4819 .- 1432-1106. ; 143, s. 11-23
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Changes in the structure of motor variability during practicing a bimanual pointing task were investigated using the framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis. The subjects performed fast and accurate planar movements with both arms, one moving the pointer and the other moving the target. The UCM hypothesis predicts that joint kinematic variability will be structured to selectively stabilize important task variables. This prediction was tested with respect to selective stabilization of the trajectory of the endpoint of each arm (unimanual control hypotheses) and with respect to selective stabilization of the timecourse of the vectorial distance between the target and the pointer tip (bimanual control hypothesis). Components of joint position variance not affecting and affecting a mean value of a selected variable were computed at each 10% of normalized movement time. The ratio of these two components ( R(V)) served as a quantitative index of selective stabilization. Both unimanual control hypotheses and the bimanual control hypothesis were supported both prior to and after practice. However, the R(V) values for the bimanual control hypothesis were significantly higher than for either of the unimanual control hypothesis, suggesting that the bimanual synergy was not simply a simultaneous execution of two unimanual synergies. After practice, an improvement in both movement speed and accuracy was accompanied by counterintuitive changes in the structure of kinematic variability. Components of joint position variance affecting and not affecting a mean value of a selected variable decreased, but there was a significantly larger drop in the latter when applied on each of the three selected task variables corresponding to the three control hypotheses. We conclude that the UCM hypothesis allows quantitative assessment of the degree of stabilization of selected performance variables and provides information on changes in the structure of a multijoint synergy that may not be reflected in its overall performance.

Keyword

Coordination
Variability
Voluntary movement
Bimanual
Human

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Domkin, Dmitry
Laczko, Jozsef
Jaric, Slobodan
Johansson, Håkan
Latash, Mark
Articles in the publication
Experimental Bra ...
By the university
Umeå University
University of Gävle

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view