SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-107037"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-107037" > Consensus Decision ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Consensus Decision Making by Fish

Sumpter, David J. T. (author)
Uppsala universitet,Matematiska institutionen
Krause, Jens (author)
James, Richard (author)
show more...
Couzin, Iain D. (author)
Ward, Ashley J. W. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2008
2008
English.
In: Current Biology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0960-9822 .- 1879-0445. ; 18:22, s. 1773-1777
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Decisions reached through consensus are often more accurate, because they efficiently utilize the diverse information possessed by group members [1-3]. A trust in consensus decision making underlies many of our democratic political and judicial institutions [4], as well as the design of web tools such as Google, Wikipedia, and prediction markets [5, 6]. In theory, consensus for the option favored by the majority of group members will lead to improved decision-making accuracy as group size increases [2, 4]. Although group-living animals are known to utilize social information [7-10], little is known about whether or not decision accuracy increases with group size. In order to reach consensus, group members must be able to integrate the disparate information they possess. Positive feedback, resulting from copying others, can spread information quickly through the group, but it can also result in all individuals making the same, possibly incorrect, choice [8,11,12]. On the other hand, if individuals never copy each other, their decision making remains independent and they fail to benefit from information exchange [4]. Here, we show how small groups of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) reach consensus when choosing which of two replica fish to follow. As group size increases, the fish make more accurate decisions, becoming better at discriminating subtle phenotypic differences of the replicas. A simple quorum rule proves sufficient to explain our observations, suggesting that animals can make accurate decisions without the need for complicated comparison of the information they possess. Furthermore, although submission to peers can lead to occasional cascades of incorrect decisions, these can be explained as a byproduct of what is usually accurate consensus decision making.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Biology
Biologi

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Sumpter, David J ...
Krause, Jens
James, Richard
Couzin, Iain D.
Ward, Ashley J. ...
About the subject
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Biological Scien ...
Articles in the publication
Current Biology
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view