SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-14400"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-14400" > Accuracy of electro...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Accuracy of electrocardiography in diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension : systematic review

Pewsner, D (author)
Juni, P (author)
Egger, M (author)
show more...
Battaglia, M (author)
Sundström, Johan (author)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
Bachmann, LM (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2007
2007
English.
In: The BMJ. - 1756-1833. ; 335:7622, s. 711-714C
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • OBJECTIVE: To review the accuracy of electrocardiography in screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies of test accuracy of six electrocardiographic indexes: the Sokolow-Lyon index, Cornell voltage index, Cornell product index, Gubner index, and Romhilt-Estes scores with thresholds for a positive test of > or =4 points or > or =5 points. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases ((Pre-)Medline, Embase), reference lists of relevant studies and previous reviews, and experts. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers scrutinised abstracts and examined potentially eligible studies. Studies comparing the electrocardiographic index with echocardiography in hypertensive patients and reporting sufficient data were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on study populations, echocardiographic criteria, and methodological quality of studies were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Negative likelihood ratios, which indicate to what extent the posterior odds of left ventricular hypertrophy is reduced by a negative test, were calculated. RESULTS: 21 studies and data on 5608 patients were analysed. The median prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy was 33% (interquartile range 23-41%) in primary care settings (10 studies) and 65% (37-81%) in secondary care settings (11 studies). The median negative likelihood ratio was similar across electrocardiographic indexes, ranging from 0.85 (range 0.34-1.03) for the Romhilt-Estes score (with threshold > or =4 points) to 0.91 (0.70-1.01) for the Gubner index. Using the Romhilt-Estes score in primary care, a negative electrocardiogram result would reduce the typical pre-test probability from 33% to 31%. In secondary care the typical pre-test probability of 65% would be reduced to 63%. CONCLUSION: Electrocardiographic criteria should not be used to rule out left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension.

Keyword

MEDICINE
MEDICIN

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

  • The BMJ (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Pewsner, D
Juni, P
Egger, M
Battaglia, M
Sundström, Johan
Bachmann, LM
Articles in the publication
The BMJ
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view