Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-161056" >
Cluster-randomized ...
-
Flather, Marcus D.
(author)
Cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effects of a quality improvement program on management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes : The European Quality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndromes (EQUIP-ACS)
- Article/chapterEnglish2011
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
-
Elsevier BV,2011
-
printrdacarrier
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-161056
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-161056URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.027DOI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
Background Registries have shown that quality of care for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often falls below the standards recommended in professional guidelines. Quality improvement (QI) is a strategy to improve standards of clinical care for patients, but the efficacy of QI for ACS has not been tested in randomized trials. Methods We undertook a prospective, cluster-randomized, multicenter, multinational study to evaluate the efficacy of a QI program for ACS. Participating centers collected data on consecutive admissions for non-ST-elevation ACS for 4 months before the QI intervention and 3 months after. Thirty-eight hospitals in France, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom were randomized to receive the QI program or not, 19 in each group. We measured 8 in-hospital quality indicators (risk stratification, coronary angiography, anticoagulation, beta-blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and clopidogrel loading and maintenance) before and after the intervention and compared composite changes between the QI and non-QI groups. Results A total of 2604 patients were enrolled. The absolute overall change in use of quality indicators in the QI group was 8.5% compared with 0.8% in the non-QI group (odds ratio for achieving a quality indicator in QI versus non-QI 1.66, 95% CI 1.43-1.94; P < .001). The main changes were observed in the use of risk stratification and clopidogrel loading dose. Conclusions The QI strategy resulted in a significant improvement in the quality indicators measured. This type of QI intervention can lead to useful changes in health care practice for ACS in a wide range of settings.
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Babalis, Daphne
(author)
-
Booth, Jean
(author)
-
Bardaji, Alfredo
(author)
-
Machecourt, Jacques
(author)
-
Opolski, Grzegorz
(author)
-
Ottani, Filippo
(author)
-
Bueno, Hector
(author)
-
Banya, Winston
(author)
-
Brady, Anthony R.
(author)
-
Bojestig, Mats
(author)
-
Lindahl, BertilUppsala universitet,Uppsala kliniska forskningscentrum (UCR),Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper(Swepub:uu)belin227
(author)
-
Uppsala universitetUppsala kliniska forskningscentrum (UCR)
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:American Heart Journal: Elsevier BV162:4, s. 700-707.e10002-87031097-6744
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database
- By the author/editor
-
Flather, Marcus ...
-
Babalis, Daphne
-
Booth, Jean
-
Bardaji, Alfredo
-
Machecourt, Jacq ...
-
Opolski, Grzegor ...
-
show more...
-
Ottani, Filippo
-
Bueno, Hector
-
Banya, Winston
-
Brady, Anthony R ...
-
Bojestig, Mats
-
Lindahl, Bertil
-
show less...
- Articles in the publication
-
American Heart J ...
- By the university
-
Uppsala University