SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-173323"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-173323" > Evaluation of IPPSE...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Evaluation of IPPSE, an alternative method for sequential population PKPD analysis

Lacroix, Brigitte D. (author)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för farmaceutisk biovetenskap
Friberg, Lena E. (author)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för farmaceutisk biovetenskap
Karlsson, Mats O (author)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för farmaceutisk biovetenskap,Pharmacometrics
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012-01-21
2012
English.
In: Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1567-567X .- 1573-8744. ; 39:2, s. 177-193
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The aim of this study is to present and evaluate an alternative sequential method to perform population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) analysis. Simultaneous PKPD analysis (SIM) is generally considered the reference method but may be computationally burdensome and time consuming. Evaluation of alternative approaches aims at speeding up the computation time and stabilizing the estimation of the models, while estimating the model parameters with good enough precision. The IPPSE method presented here uses the individual PK parameter estimates and their uncertainty (SE) to propagate the PK information to the PD estimation step, while the IPP method uses the individual PK parameters only and the PPP&D method utilizes the PK data. Data sets (n = 200) with various study designs were simulated according to a one-compartment PK model and a direct Emax PD model. The study design of each dataset was randomly selected. The same PK and PD models were fitted to the simulated observations using the SIM, IPP, PPP&D and IPPSE methods. The performances of the methods were compared with respect to estimation precision and bias, and computation time. Estimated precision and bias for the IPPSE method were similar to that of SIM and PPP&D, while IPP had higher bias and imprecision. Compared with the SIM method, IPPSE saved more computation time (61%) than PPP&D (39%), while IPP remained the fastest method (86% run time saved). The IPPSE method is a promising alternative for PKPD analysis, combining the advantages of the SIM (higher precision and lower bias of parameter estimates) and the IPP (shorter run time) methods.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Farmaceutiska vetenskaper (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Pharmaceutical Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

PKPD analysis
NONMEM 7
IPPSE
PPP&D
IPP

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Lacroix, Brigitt ...
Friberg, Lena E.
Karlsson, Mats O
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Basic Medicine
and Pharmaceutical S ...
Articles in the publication
Journal of Pharm ...
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view