SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-183458"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-183458" > Robust population p...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Robust population pharmacokinetic experiment design.

Dodds, Michael G (author)
Hooker, Andrew C. (author)
Vicini, Paolo (author)
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2005
2005
English.
In: Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1567-567X .- 1573-8744. ; 32:1, s. 33-64
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The population approach to estimating mixed effects model parameters of interest in pharmacokinetic (PK) studies has been demonstrated to be an effective method in quantifying relevant population drug properties. The information available for each individual is usually sparse. As such, care should be taken to ensure that the information gained from each population experiment is as efficient as possible by designing the experiment optimally, according to some criterion. The classic approach to this problem is to design "good" sampling schedules, usually addressed by the D-optimality criterion. This method has the drawback of requiring exact advanced knowledge (expected values) of the parameters of interest. Often, this information is not available. Additionally, if such prior knowledge about the parameters is misspecified, this approach yields designs that may not be robust for parameter estimation. In order to incorporate uncertainty in the prior parameter specification, a number of criteria have been suggested. We focus on ED-optimality. This criterion leads to a difficult numerical problem, which is made tractable here by a novel approximation of the expectation integral usually solved by stochastic integration techniques. We present two case studies as evidence of the robustness of ED-optimal designs in the face of misspecified prior information. Estimates from replicate simulated population data show that such misspecified ED-optimal designs recover parameter estimates that are better than similarly misspecified D-optimal designs, and approach estimates gained from D-optimal designs where the parameters are correctly specified.

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Dodds, Michael G
Hooker, Andrew C ...
Vicini, Paolo
Articles in the publication
Journal of Pharm ...
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view