SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-213840"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-213840" > Peak Finder Metaser...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Peak Finder Metaserver - a novel application for finding peaks in ChIP-seq data

Kruczyk, Marcin (author)
Uppsala universitet,Beräknings- och systembiologi
Umer, Husen Muhammad (author)
Uppsala universitet,Beräknings- och systembiologi
Enroth, Stefan (author)
Uppsala universitet,Genomik
show more...
Komorowski, Jan (author)
Uppsala universitet,Beräknings- och systembiologi
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013-09-23
2013
English.
In: BMC Bioinformatics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2105. ; 14, s. 280-
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: Finding peaks in ChIP-seq is an important process in biological inference. In some cases, such as positioning nucleosomes with specific histone modifications or finding transcription factor binding specificities, the precision of the detected peak plays a significant role. There are several applications for finding peaks (called peak finders) based on different algorithms (e.g. MACS, Erange and HPeak). Benchmark studies have shown that the existing peak finders identify different peaks for the same dataset and it is not known which one is the most accurate. We present the first meta-server called Peak Finder MetaServer (PFMS) that collects results from several peak finders and produces consensus peaks. Our application accepts three standard ChIP-seq data formats: BED, BAM, and SAM. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of seven widely used peak finders were examined. For the experiments we used three previously studied Transcription Factors (TF) ChIP-seq datasets and identified three of the selected peak finders that returned results with high specificity and very good sensitivity compared to the remaining four. We also ran PFMS using the three selected peak finders on the same TF datasets and achieved higher specificity and sensitivity than the peak finders individually. Conclusions: We show that combining outputs from up to seven peak finders yields better results than individual peak finders. In addition, three of the seven peak finders outperform the remaining four, and running PFMS with these three returns even more accurate results. Another added value of PFMS is a separate report of the peaks returned by each of the included peak finders.

Keyword

Transcription factor
Peak finder
ChIP-seq
Metaserver

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view