SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-274342"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-274342" > Austerity Politics :

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Austerity Politics : Is the Electorate Responsible?

Nyman, Pär, 1984- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
Lindgren, Karl-Oskar, Docent (thesis advisor)
Uppsala universitet,Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
Vernby, Kåre, Docent (thesis advisor)
Uppsala universitet,Statsvetenskapliga institutionen,Stockholms universitet, statsvetenskapliga institutionen
show more...
Lindvall, Johannes, Professor (opponent)
Lunds universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
ISBN 9789155494599
Uppsala : Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2016
English 35 s.
Series: Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, 1652-9030 ; 124
  • Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This thesis contributes to the public finance literature concerned with fiscal sustainability, and consists of an introduction and four stand-alone essays. The first three essays analyse the reasons why governments accumulate large levels of debt. In the first essay, I find that parties that implement fiscal consolidations are punished by the voters in the following election. However, there does not appear to be a rewarding effect for governments that implement fiscal expansions. The second essay, which is co-authored with Rafael Ahlskog, shows how voter opposition to fiscal consolidation is shaped by moral considerations and feelings of personal responsibility. More precisely, we argue that voters are more likely to refuse fiscal consolidation when they do not feel responsible for the public debt. The third essay argues that misperceptions about the business cycle would have caused fiscal problems even if policy-making was conducted by independent experts. According to my estimates, biased projections have weakened annual budget balances by approximately one per cent of GDP. In the fourth essay, I argue that budgetary mechanisms created to improve fiscal discipline have a bias toward a reduced public sector. Because discretionary decisions are usually required to adjust public expenditures to price and wage increases, periods of rapid growth have repeatedly caused the welfare state to shrink. I use the introduction to discuss the commonalities between the essays and to situate the field of public finance in a broader, historical context.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap -- Statsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science -- Political Science (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Deficit bias
Fiscal policy
Perceptions
Political economy
Responsibility
Retrospective voting
Statskunskap
Political Science

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
dok (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view