SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-309185"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-309185" > Gender-related expl...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Gender-related explanatory models of depression : a critical evaluation of medical articles

Hammarström, Anne (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin
Lehti, Arja (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin
Danielsson, Ulla (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin
show more...
Bengs, Carita, 1964- (author)
Umeå universitet,Sociologiska institutionen
Johansson, E.E. (author)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2009
2009
English.
In: Public Health. - : Elsevier. - 0033-3506 .- 1476-5616. ; 123:10, s. 689-693
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objectives: Although research has consistently shown a higher prevalence of depression among women compared with men, there is a lack of consensus regarding explanatory factors for these gender-related differences. The aim of this paper was to analyse the scientific quality of different gender-related explanatory models of depression in the medical database PubMed.Study design: Qualitative and quantitative analyses of PubMed articles.Methods: In a database search in PubMed for 2002, 82 articles on gender and depression were selected and analysed with qualitative and quantitative content analyses. In total, 10 explanatory factors and four explanatory models were found. The ISI Web of Science database was searched in order to obtain the citation number and journal impact factor for each article.Results: The most commonly used gender-related explanatory model for depression was the biomedical model (especially gonadal hormones), followed by the sociocultural and psychological models. Compared with the other models, the biomedical model scored highest on bibliometric measures but lowest on measures of multifactorial dimensions and differences within the group of men/women.Conclusion: The biomedical model for explaining gender-related aspects of depression had the highest quality when bibliometric methods were used. However, the sociocultural and psychological models had higher quality than the biomedical model when multifactoriality and intersectionality were analysed. There is a need for the development of new methods in order to evaluate the scientific quality of research.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Public health
Depression
Gender
Explanatory models
Bibliometric methods
Intersectionality
Multifactoriality
Public health medicine research areas
Folkhälsomedicinska forskningsområden

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view