SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-441822"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-441822" > Influence of the Re...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Influence of the Rear Interface on Composition and Photoluminescence Yield of CZTSSe Absorbers: A Case for an Al2O3 Intermediate Layer

Antonio Cabas, Vidani (author)
Léo, Choubrac (author)
Jose, Marquez-Prieto (author)
show more...
Thomas, Unold (author)
Matthias, Maiberg (author)
Roland, Scheer (author)
Li, Hu, 1986- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Tillämpad materialvetenskap,Shandong Univ, Sch Microelect, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China,Electron microscopy and Nanoengineering
Leifer, Klaus, 1965- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Tillämpad materialvetenskap,Electron microscopy and Nanoengineering
Robin, Pauer (author)
Evgeniia, Gilshtein (author)
A. N., Tiwari (author)
Yaroslav, Romanyuk (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-04-19
2021
English.
In: ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. - : American Chemical Society (ACS). - 1944-8244 .- 1944-8252. ; 13:16, s. 19487-19496
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The rear interface of kesterite absorbers with Mo back contact represents one of the possible sources of nonradiative voltage losses (Delta V-oc,V-nrad) because of the reported decomposition reactions, an uncontrolled growth of MoSe2, or a nonoptimal electrical contact with high recombination. Several intermediate layers (IL), such as MoO3, TiN, and ZnO, have been tested to mitigate these issues, and efficiency improvements have been reported. However, the introduction of IL also triggers other effects such as changes in alkali diffusion, altered morphology, and modifications in the absorber composition, all factors that can also influence Delta V-oc,V-nrad. In this study, the different effects are decoupled by designing a special sample that directly compares four rear structures (SLG, SLG/Mo, SLG/Al2O3, and SLG/Mo/Al2O3) with a Na-doped kesterite absorber optimized for a device efficiency >10%. The IL of choice is Al2O3 because of its reported beneficial effect to reduce the surface recombination velocity at the rear interface of solar cell absorbers. Identical annealing conditions and alkali distribution in the kesterite absorber are preserved, as measured by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The lowest Delta V-oc,V-nrad of 290 mV is measured for kesterite grown on Mo, whereas the kesterite absorber on Al2O3 exhibits higher nonradiative losses up to 350 mV. The anticipated field-effect passivation from Al2O3 at the rear interface could not be observed for the kesterite absorbers prepared by the two-step process, further confirmed by an additional experiment with air annealing. Our results suggest that Mo with an in situ formed MoSe2 remains a suitable back contact for high-efficiency kesterite devices.

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view