SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-483748"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-483748" > Misinterpretations ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Misinterpretations of P-values and statistical tests persist among researchers and professionals working with statistics and epidemiology

Lytsy, Per, 1968- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Allmänmedicin och preventivmedicin
Hartman, Mikael (author)
Pingel, Ronnie, 1978- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Statistiska institutionen,Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-08-05
2022
English.
In: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. - : Upsala Medical Society. - 0300-9734 .- 2000-1967. ; 127:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: The aim was to investigate inferences of statistically significant test results among persons with more or less statistical education and research experience.Methods: A total of 75 doctoral students and 64 statisticians/epidemiologist responded to a web questionnaire about inferences of statistically significant findings. Participants were asked about their education and research experience, and also whether a 'statistically significant' test result (P = 0.024, alpha-level 0.05) could be inferred as proof or probability statements about the truth or falsehood of the null hypothesis (H-0) and the alternative hypothesis (H-1).Results: Almost all participants reported having a university degree, and among statisticians/epidemiologist, most reported having a university degree in statistics and were working professionally with statistics. Overall, 9.4% of statisticians/epidemiologist and 24.0% of doctoral students responded that the statistically significant finding proved that H-0 is not true, and 73.4% of statisticians/epidemiologists and 53.3% of doctoral students responded that the statistically significant finding indicated that H(0 )is improbable. Corresponding numbers about inferences about the alternative hypothesis (H-1) were 12.0% and 6.2% about proving H-1 being true and 62.7 and 62.5% for the conclusion that H-1 is probable. Correct inferences to both questions, which is that a statistically significant finding cannot be inferred as either proof or a measure of a hypothesis' probability, were given by 10.7% of doctoral students and 12.5% of statisticians/epidemiologists.Conclusions: Misinterpretation of P-values and statistically significant test results persists also among persons who have substantial statistical education and who work professionally with statistics.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Matematik -- Sannolikhetsteori och statistik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Mathematics -- Probability Theory and Statistics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Statistical inference
null hypothesis significance testing
statistics
frequentist
P-value

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Lytsy, Per, 1968 ...
Hartman, Mikael
Pingel, Ronnie, ...
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Health Sciences
and Public Health Gl ...
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Mathematics
and Probability Theo ...
Articles in the publication
Upsala Journal o ...
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view