SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-509579"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-509579" > Truthful Mechanism ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Truthful Mechanism Design for Wireless Powered Network With Channel Gain Reporting

Wang, Zhe (author)
Alpcan, Tansu (author)
Evans, Jamie S. (author)
show more...
Dey, Subhrakanti (author)
Hamilton Institute, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Ireland
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2019
2019
English.
In: IEEE Transactions on Communications. - : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). - 0090-6778 .- 1558-0857. ; 67:11, s. 7966-7979
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Directional wireless power transfer (WPT) technology provides a promising energy solution to remotely recharge the Internet of things sensors using directional antennas. Under a harvest-then-transmit protocol, the access point can adaptively allocate the transmit power among multiple energy directions to maximize the social welfare of the sensors, i.e., downlink sum received energy or uplink sum rate, based on full or quantized channel gains reported from the sensors. However, such power allocation can be challenged if each sensor belongs to a different agent and works in a competitive way. In order to maximize their own utilities, the sensors have the incentives to falsely report their channel gains, which unfortunately reduces the social welfare. To tackle this problem, we design the strategy-proof mechanisms to ensure that each sensor’s dominant strategy is to truthfully reveal its channel gain regardless of other sensors’ strategies. Under the benchmark full channel gain reporting (CGR) scheme, we adopt the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism to derive the price functions for both downlink and uplink, where the truthfulness is guaranteed by asking each sensor to pay the social welfare loss of all other sensors attributable to its presence. For the 1-bit CGR scheme, the problem is more challenging due to the severe information asymmetry, where each sensor has true valuation of full channel gain but may report the false information of quantized channel gain. We prove that the classic VCG mechanism is no longer truthful and then propose two threshold-based price functions for both downlink and uplink, where the truthfulness is ensured by letting each sensor pay its own achievable utility improvement due to its participation. The numerical results validate the truthfulness of the proposed mechanism designs.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Kommunikationssystem (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Communication Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Directional wireless power transfer
limited channel feedback
game theory
mechanism design
dominant-strategy incentive-compatibility

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Wang, Zhe
Alpcan, Tansu
Evans, Jamie S.
Dey, Subhrakanti
About the subject
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING AND ...
and Electrical Engin ...
and Communication Sy ...
Articles in the publication
IEEE Transaction ...
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view