SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-522250"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-522250" > Experiences and opi...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Experiences and opinions of general practitioners with patient online record access : an online survey in England

Blease, Charlotte (author)
Uppsala universitet,E-hälsa och hälsodata,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Kharko, Anna (author)
Uppsala universitet,E-hälsa och hälsodata,Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
Dong, Zhiyong (author)
show more...
Jones, Ray B (author)
Davidge, Gail (author)
Hägglund, Maria, Lektor, 1975- (author)
Uppsala universitet,E-hälsa och hälsodata,Medtech Science & Innovation Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Turner, Andrew (author)
DesRoches, Catherine (author)
McMillan, Brian (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2024
2024
English.
In: BMJ Open. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2044-6055. ; 14:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • OBJECTIVE: To describe the experiences and opinions of general practitioners (GPs) in England regarding patients having access to their full online GP health records.DESIGN: Convenience sample, online survey.PARTICIPANTS: 400 registered GPs in England.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Investigators measured GPs' experiences and opinions about online record access (ORA), including patient care and their practice.RESULTS: A total of 400 GPs from all regions of England responded. A minority (130, 33%) believed ORA was a good idea. Most GPs believed a majority of patients would worry more (364, 91%) or find their GP records more confusing than helpful (338, 85%). Most GPs believed a majority of patients would find significant errors in their records (240, 60%), would better remember their care plan (280, 70%) and feel more in control of their care (243, 60%). The majority believed they will/already spend more time addressing patients' questions outside of consultations (357, 89%), that consultations will/already take significantly longer (322, 81%) and that they will be/already are less candid in their documentation (289, 72%) after ORA. Nearly two-thirds of GPs believed ORA would increase their litigation (246, 62%).CONCLUSIONS: Similar to clinicians in other countries, GPs in our sample were sceptical of ORA, believing patients would worry more and find their records more confusing than helpful. Most GPs also believed the practice would exacerbate work burdens. However, the majority of GPs in this survey also agreed there were multiple benefits to patients having online access to their primary care health records. The findings of this survey also contribute to a growing body of contrastive research from countries where ORA is advanced, demonstrating clinicians are sceptical while studies indicate patients appear to derive multiple benefits.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Electronic Health Records
Patients
Surveys and Questionnaires
Medical Informatics
Medicinsk informatik

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

  • BMJ Open (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view