Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:vti-366" >
Comparing Three Mod...
Comparing Three Models for Introduction of Competition into Railways
-
- Nash, Chris (author)
- Univ. of Leeds,Institute for Transport Studies
-
- Nilsson, Jan-Eric, 1952- (author)
- Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut,Transportekonomi Stockholm, TEK-S
-
- Link, Heike (author)
- DIW, Berlin
-
Univ of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies (creator_code:org_t)
- Bath : University of Bath, 2013
- 2013
- English.
-
In: Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. - Bath : University of Bath. - 0022-5258 .- 1754-5951. ; 47:2, s. 191-206
- Related links:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- This paper compares three European countries with long experience of competition in rail transport— Britain, Sweden, and Germany. Given the nature of the reforms undertaken, we would expect theBritish approach to be the most successful, with Sweden next and Germany least successful. But anexamination of subsidy levels and trends in passenger and freight traffic finds that Germany has theslowest growth in public financial support for its railway, as well as the lowest increase in fares. Whiletraffic growth is faster in the other countries, it is not clear that reforms there have provided bettervalue for money.
Subject headings
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Nationalekonomi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Economics and Business -- Economics (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- Deregulation
- Competition
- Market
- Financing
- Subsidy
- Rail bound transport
- Evaluation (assessment)
- United Kingdom
- Sweden
- Germany
- Railway: Economics
- Railway: Economics
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database