SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/130916"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/130916" > The effect of study...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC.

Wolters, Tineke (author)
Roobol, Monique J (author)
Steyerberg, Ewout W (author)
show more...
van den Bergh, Roderick C N (author)
Bangma, Chris H (author)
Hugosson, Jonas, 1955 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper,Institute of Clinical Sciences
Ciatto, Stefano (author)
Kwiatkowski, Maciej (author)
Villers, Arnauld (author)
Luján, Marcos (author)
Nelen, Vera (author)
Tammela, Teuvo L J (author)
Schröder, Fritz H (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Wiley, 2010
2010
English.
In: International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer. - : Wiley. - 1097-0215. ; 126:10, s. 2387-93
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Prostate cancer (PC) mortality is the most valid end-point in screening trials, but could be influenced by the choice of initial treatment if treatment has an effect on mortality. In this study, PC treatment was compared between the screening and control arms in a screening trial. Data were collected from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). The characteristics and initial treatment of PC cases detected in the screening and the control arm were compared. Polytomous logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of study arm on treatment, adjusting for potential confounders and with statistical imputation of missing values. A total of 8,389 PC cases were detected, 5,422 in the screening arm and 3,145 in the control arm. Polytomous regression showed that trial arm was associated with treatment choice after correction for missing values, especially in men with high-risk PC. A control subject with high-risk PC was more likely than a screen subject to receive radiotherapy (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.01-2.05, p = 0.047), expectant management (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.33-6.42, p = 0.007) or hormonal treatment (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.07-2.94, p = 0.026) instead of radical prostatectomy. However, trial arm had only a minor role in treatment choice compared to other variables. In conclusion, a small effect of trial arm on treatment choice was seen, particularly in men with high-risk PC. Therefore, differences in treatment between arms are unlikely to play a major role in the interpretation of the results of the ERSPC.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Urologi och njurmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Urology and Nephrology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Aged
Androgen Antagonists
therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents
Hormonal
therapeutic use
Europe
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Staging
Odds Ratio
Prostatectomy
methods
Prostatic Neoplasms
diagnosis
drug therapy
pathology
radiotherapy
surgery
therapy
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view