SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/155866"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/155866" > Feedback Analysis i...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Taghavi, Hamidreza,1981Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology (author)

Feedback Analysis in Percutaneous Bone-Conduction Device and Bone-Conduction Implant on a Dry Cranium

  • Article/chapterEnglish2012

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2012
  • electronicrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/155866
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/155866URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182487fc8DOI
  • https://research.chalmers.se/publication/155866URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Hypothesis: The bone-conduction implant (BCI) can use a higher gain setting without having feedback problems compared with a percutaneous bone-conduction device (PBCD). Background: The conventional PBCD, today, is a common treatment for patients with conductive hearing loss and single-sided deafness. However, there are minor drawbacks reported related to the percutaneous implant and specifically poor high-frequency gain. The BCI system is designed as an alternative to the percutaneous system because it leaves the skin intact and is less prone to fall into feedback oscillations, thus allowing more high-frequency gain. Methods: Loop gains of the Baha Classic 300 and the BCI were measured in the frequency range of 100 to 10,000 Hz attached to a Skull simulator and a dry cranium. The Baha and the BCI positions were investigated. The devices were adjusted to full-on gain. Results: It was found that the gain headroom using the BCI was generally 0 to 10 dB better at higher frequencies than using the Baha for a given mechanical output. More specifically, if the mechanical output of the devices were normalized at the cochlear level the improvement in gain headroom with the BCI versus the Baha were in the range of 10 to 30 dB. Conclusion: Using a BCI, significantly higher gain setting can be used without feedback problems as compared with using a PBCD.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Håkansson, Bo,1953Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology(Swepub:cth)boh (author)
  • Reinfeldt, Sabine,1978Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology(Swepub:cth)f97sare (author)
  • Eeg-Olofsson, Måns,1967Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för öron-, näs- och halssjukdomar,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Otorhinolaryngology,University of Gothenburg(Swepub:gu)xeegma (author)
  • Akhshijan, Shirin Sadat,1985Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology(Swepub:cth)sadat (author)
  • Chalmers tekniska högskolaInstitutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för öron-, näs- och halssjukdomar (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Otology and Neurotology33:3, s. 413-4201531-71291537-4505

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view