SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/161443"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/161443" > How representative ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

How representative is a self-selected web-panel? The effect on representativeness of different sampling procedures and survey modes

Dahlberg, Stefan, 1975 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Statsvetenskapliga institutionen,Department of Political Science
Martinsson, Johan, 1975 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Statsvetenskapliga institutionen,Department of Political Science
Lundmark, Sebastian, 1986 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Statsvetenskapliga institutionen,Department of Political Science
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012
2012
English.
In: The Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Orlando, May 2012.
  • Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This paper makes a systematic comparison between different sampling procedures and survey modes by making use of three different types of surveys. In all three surveys, identical questions and wordings are used. However, they are all three separate studies whereas the first study is based on a representative sample of approximately 3 000 Swedish citizens (based on the national census register). This study is carried out as a traditional postal survey by the Swedish SOM-institute. The second study is also based on a representative sample of approximately 3 000 Swedish citizens (recruited by telephone from the national census register), but in this case the survey is entirely carried out as a web-survey, distributed by e-mail. The third and final study is carried out as a web-survey as well but is instead based on a selfrecruited citizen panel of 10 000 Swedish citizens. All three surveys were carried out during October to December, 2011. In order to evaluate potential differences between varying sampling procedures and survey modes, we will a) compare the composition of respondents in terms of general SES-related background characteristics between the three surveys, both in terms of potential differences in levels and correlations, and b) analyze the differences in three sets of questions tapping, values, attitudes and behavior. By doing this we will be able to uncover how representative a large-sample self-recruited panel actually can become as well as what the usage of new technological media in surveys does to an initially representative sample in a technologically advanced country. Important questions that we will be able to answer concerns to what extent different sampling procedures and survey modes affect the representativeness of a sample? If potential differences varies between different types of survey questions, i.e. questions relating to values, attitudes and behavior etc.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Matematik -- Sannolikhetsteori och statistik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Mathematics -- Probability Theory and Statistics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

sampling
representativeness
web surveys
random sampling
self-recruited samples

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
kon (subject category)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Dahlberg, Stefan ...
Martinsson, Joha ...
Lundmark, Sebast ...
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Political Scienc ...
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Mathematics
and Probability Theo ...
Articles in the publication
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view