SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/162137"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/162137" > INTERNAL CONSTRUCT ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

INTERNAL CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE RIVERMEAD POST-CONCUSSION SYMPTOMS QUESTIONNAIRE

Lannsjö, Marianne (author)
Uppsala universitet,Rehabiliteringsmedicin
Borg, J (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Bjorklund, G (author)
show more...
af Geijerstam, JL (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Lundgren Nilsson, Åsa, 1965 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för klinisk neurovetenskap och rehabilitering,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Medical Journals Sweden AB, 2011
2011
English.
In: JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1650-1977 .- 1651-2081. ; 43:11, s. 997-1002
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Abstract: Objective: To investigate the internal construct validity of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) by Rasch analysis of data from a national cohort of patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Methods: Data collected at 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury from 2,523 patients were analysed using the partial credit model, describing rating scale structure, local dependency, age and gender differential functioning, dimensionality and model fit. Results: Categories did not work in a consistent manner; however, collapsing of Categories 1 and 2 yielded ordered thresholds. Local dependency of items was present and 2 item pairs were combined. There was no differential item functioning by gender or age. The Rasch factor explained 47.7% of the variance and the first contrast explained 12.4% of the unexplained variance (eigenvalue 1.9). Further analysis indicated 3 or more dimensions. Person measure had a mean of -2.16, showing poor targeting of persons to items. Person reliability was 0.71 and person separation index was 1.56. Conclusion: According to this Rasch analysis of data from a representative sample of mild traumatic brain injury, the RPQ may not be optimal for this population. Even after reducing the number of categories and collapsing items with local dependency, unidimensionality was not reached, which argues against summation of a total score. However, the scale is unbiased for gender and age.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Annan klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Other Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)

Keyword

mild traumatic brain injury
rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire
rasch analysis
Rehabilitation Medicine

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view