Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/220295" >
Immediate, early (3...
Immediate, early (3 weeks) and conventional loading (4 months) of single implants: Preliminary data at 1 year after loading from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial
- Article/chapterEnglish2015
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/220295
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/220295URI
Supplementary language notes
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcome of single implants which underwent immediate nonocclusal loading with implants subjected to early non-occlusal loading at 3 weeks, and implants conventionally loaded at 4 months. Materials and methods: One hundred and five patients in five private practices requiring a single implant-supported crown were randomised to immediate loading (35 patients), early loading (35 patients) and conventional loading (35 patients) groups. To be immediately or early loaded, implants had to be inserted with a torque superior to 45 Ncm. Immediately and early loaded implants received non-occluding temporary crows, whereas conventionally loaded implants were directly restored with definitive crowns. Temporary crowns were replaced by definitive ones after 4 months. Outcome measures were crown and implant failures, complications and pen-implant marginal bone level changes recorded by a blinded assessor. Results: Two patients dropped out from the immediate loading group up to 1-year post-loading. Two implants failed, one in the immediately loaded and one in the early loaded group (P = 0.601). One immediately loaded implant and two early loaded implants were affected by one complication each (P = 0.162). Mean pen-implant marginal bone loss after 1 year was -0.120 +/- 0.230 mm (95% Cl -0.35, 0.10) for immediate, -0.390 0.840 mm (95% Cl -1.23, 0.45) for early and -0.201 +/- 0.306 mm (95% Cl -0.51; 0.11) for conventionally loaded implants. There were no statistically significant differences for any of the outcome measures between the three loading strategies up to 1-year post-loading. Conclusions: No major clinical differences were observed with regard to implant survival, complications and marginal bone level changes when loading single implants immediately, early or conventionally.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Guazzi, P.
(author)
-
Samarani, R.
(author)
-
Tohme, H.
(author)
-
Khoury, S.
(author)
-
Sbricoli, L.
(author)
-
Grandi, G.
(author)
-
Esposito, Marco,1965Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Biomaterials(Swepub:gu)xespom
(author)
-
Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:European Journal of Oral Implantology8:2, s. 115-1261756-2406
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database