SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/232804"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/232804" > Early Osseointegrat...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Early Osseointegration Events on Neoss® ProActive and Bimodal Implants: A Comparison of Different Surfaces in an Animal Model

Grossi-Oliveira, G.A. (author)
Antunes, A.A. (author)
Elias, C.N. (author)
show more...
Wennerberg, Ann (author)
Malmö högskola,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Sennerby, Lars, 1960 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för odontologi, sektion 1,Institute of Odontology, Section 1
Salata, L.A. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2014-02-20
2015
English.
In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - : Wiley. - 1523-0899 .- 1708-8208. ; 17:6, s. 1060-1072
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Background: Cell interactions, adherence, and osseointegration at the bone-implant interface can be directly influenced by the surface properties of the titanium implant. Purpose: To characterize osseointegration of Neoss® implants with conventional (control group) and hydrophilic (test group) surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Six Labrador dogs received Neoss implants with conventional and hydrophilic surfaces. The bone-implant interfaces were evaluated 1 and 4 weeks after implantation, and osseointegration was evaluated using histological, histomorphometric, fluorescence, and resonance frequency analyses. The surfaces were also subjected to topographic and hydrophilicity analyses. Results: The topographic analyses revealed increased surface roughness in the test group compared with the control group (surface area roughness 0.42 and 0.78μm, respectively, for control and test group surfaces; p≤.05). The wettability values were higher in the test group (contact angles 67.2° and 27.2° for the control and test group surfaces, respectively; p≤.05). Implants in the test group also exhibited better stability, more bone-implant contact, and increased bone area compared with implants in the control group. Conclusion: Neoss implants in the test group improved bone formation in the early stages of osseointegration compared with implants in the control group.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Animal model
Bone-implant interface
Implant surface
Surface properties
Surface topography
animal model

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view