SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/239605"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/239605" > Machined versus rou...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Machined versus roughened immediately loaded and finally restored single implants inserted flapless: Preliminary 6-month data from a split-mouth randomised controlled trial

Cannizzaro, G. (author)
Felice, P. (author)
Loi, I. (author)
show more...
Viola, P. (author)
Ferri, V. (author)
Leone, M. (author)
Lazzarini, M. (author)
Trullenque-Eriksson, A. (author)
Esposito, Marco, 1965 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Biomaterials
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2016
2016
English.
In: European Journal of Oral Implantology. - 1756-2406. ; 9:2, s. 155-163
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Purpose: To compare the outcome of immediately loaded single implants with a machined or a roughened surface. Materials and methods: Fifty patients had two implant sites randomly allocated to receive flapless-placed single Syra implants (Sweden & Martina), one with a machined and one with a roughened surface (sand-blasted with zirconia powder and acid etched), according to a split-mouth design. To be loaded immediately, implants had to be inserted with a torque superior to 50 Ncm. Implants were restored with definitive crowns in direct occlusal contact within 48 h. Patients were followed for 6 months after loading. Outcome measures were prosthetic and implant failures and complications. Results: Two machined implants and four roughened implants were not loaded immediately. Six months after loading no dropout occurred. One implant loaded late, which had a rough implant surface, failed 20 days after loading (P (McNemar test) = 0.625; difference in proportions = -0.04; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.07). Three crowns had to be remade on machined implants and four on roughened implants (P (McNemar test) = 1.000; difference in proportions = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.08). Three machined and five roughened implants experienced complications (P (McNemar test) = 0.625; difference in proportions = -0.04; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.07). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for crown and implant losses as well as complications. Conclusions: Up to 6 months after loading both machined and roughened flapless-placed and immediately loaded single implants provided good and similar results, however, longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of implants with different surfaces.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)

Keyword

dental implants
flapless
immediate loading
implant surface
machined
randomised controlled trial
controlled clinical-trial
partially edentulous patients
arch
prostheses
dental implants
placement
surgery
system
torque
Dentistry
Oral Surgery & Medicine

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view