Fighting Corruption in Education: What Works and Who Benefits?

Borcan, Oana, 1987 (author)

Lindahl, Mikael, 1967 (author): Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik,Department of Economics

Mitrut, Andreea, 1977 (author): Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik,Department of Economics

(creator_code:org_t)

American Economic Association, 2017
2017
English.
In: American Economic Journal-Economic Policy. - : American Economic Association. - 1945-7731 .- 1945-774X. ; 9:1, s. 180-209

Related links:: https://www.aeaweb.o...; show more...; https://gup.ub.gu.se...; https://doi.org/10.1...; show less...

Abstract Subject headings

We investigate the efficiency and distributional consequences of a corruptionfighting initiative in Romania targeting the endemic fraud in a high-stakes high school exit exam, which introduced CCTV monitoring of the exam and credible punishment threats. We find that punishment coupled with monitoring was effective in reducing corruption. Estimating the heterogeneous impact for students of different ability, poverty status, and gender, we show that fighting corruption led to efficiency gains (ability predicts exam outcomes better) but also to a worrisome score gap increase between poor and non-poor students. Consequently,the poor students have reduced chances to enter an elite university.

By the author/editor: Borcan, Oana, 19 ...; Lindahl, Mikael, ...; Mitrut, Andreea, ...

About the subject

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.