SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/262231"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/262231" > Ambidextrous mechan...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Ambidextrous mechanism for agile governance: The role of Shadow Innovation in Digital Government

Koutsikouri, Dina, 1970 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad informationsteknologi (GU),Department of Applied Information Technology (GU)
Magnusson, Johan, 1976 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad informationsteknologi (GU),Department of Applied Information Technology (GU)
Päivärinta, Tero (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad informationsteknologi (GU),Department of Applied Information Technology (GU)
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017
2017
English.
In: Pre-ICIS Workshop on eGovernment, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Digital government highlights the necessity for increased innovation capabilities for governments. Hence, new forms of governance are called for that make it possible to unite innovation and efficiency and break with institutional tradition which suggests a need for balancing trade-offs. Previous calls for research have highlighted the need for an increased understanding of agile governance mechanism, particularly associated with theories of organizational ambidexterity. To this end, this paper addresses the research question: “How do public sector organizations practice ambidexterity in their ICT governance?”. Following an interpretive study approach, we analyze two government agencies in order to reveal how they balance efficiency and innovation within the context of information systems portfolios. The findings demonstrate a misalignment of strategic-tactic-operative levels in the investment justification process where at the tactical level there is a tendency to over-emphasize benefits associated with efficiency rather than innovation gains, referred to as “efficiency creep”. This misalignment is alleviated at the operative level, where co-workers engage in non-sanctioned innovation activities, referred to as “shadow innovation”. Shadow innovation is discussed as an example of an ambidextrous mechanism for agile governance, ending up in implications for future research.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Innovation
digital government
shadow innovation
efficiency creep

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
kon (subject category)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Koutsikouri, Din ...
Magnusson, Johan ...
Päivärinta, Tero
About the subject
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Computer and Inf ...
Articles in the publication
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view