SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/264362"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/264362" > EUS-guided reverse ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study

Hedenström, Per (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för invärtesmedicin och klinisk nutrition,Institute of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition
Demir, A. (author)
Khodakaram, K. (author)
show more...
Nilsson, O. (author)
Sadik, R. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-01-04
2018
English.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0036-5521 .- 1502-7708. ; 53:2, s. 231-237
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objectives: Different diagnostic entities can present as solid pancreatic lesions (SPL). This study aimed to explore the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) in SPLs.Material and methods: In 2012-2015, consecutive patients with SPLs were prospectively included in a tertiary center setting and subjected to dual needle sampling with a 22 gauge reverse bevel biopsy needle and a conventional 25 gauge open tip aspiration needle (EUS-FNA). The outcome measures were the diagnostic accuracy of sampling, calculated for each modality separately and for the modalities combined (EUS-FNA+FNB), and the adverse event rate related to sampling.Results: In 68 unique study subjects, the most common diagnostic entities were pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, PNET, (34%), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC, (32%), pancreatitis (15%) and metastasis (6%). The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB was not significantly different from that of EUS-FNA, (69% vs. 78%, p=.31). EUS-FNA+FNB, compared with EUS-FNA alone, had a higher sensitivity for tumors other than PDAC (89% vs. 69%, p=.02) but not for PDACs (95% vs. 85%, p=.5). No adverse event was recorded after the study dual-needle sampling procedures.Conclusions: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition performed with a 22 gauge reverse bevel biopsy needle is safe but not superior to conventional fine-needle aspiration performed with a 25 gauge open tip needle in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. However, the performance of both these modalities may facilitate the diagnostic work-up in selected patients, such as cases suspicious for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and metastases. NCT02360839.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Endoscopic ultrasonography
endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration
fine needle biopsy
neuroendocrine tumors
pancreatic neoplasms
equipment safety
risk management
endoscopic ultrasound
randomized-trial
tissue acquisition
diagnostic-accuracy
standard needle
mass lesions
core needle
metaanalysis
multicenter
adenocarcinoma
Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Hedenström, Per
Demir, A.
Khodakaram, K.
Nilsson, O.
Sadik, R.
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
Articles in the publication
Scandinavian Jou ...
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view