SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/266044"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/266044" > Benefits and risks ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hallberg, Håkan (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper,Institute of Clinical Sciences
Rafnsdottir, Svanheidur (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper,Institute of Clinical Sciences
Selvaggi, Gennaro, 1973 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper,Institute of Clinical Sciences
show more...
Strandell, Annika, 1956 (author)
Samuelsson, Ola (author)
Stadig, Ida (author)
Svanberg, Therese (author)
Hansson, Emma, 1981 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för plastikkirurgi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Plastic Surgery
Lewin, Richard, 1976 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper,Institute of Clinical Sciences
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018
2018
English.
In: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. - 2000-656X .- 2000-6764. ; 52:3, s. 130-147
Related links:
https://gup.ub.gu.se...
show more...
https://doi.org/10.1...
show less...
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • In modern implant-based immediate breast reconstruction, it has become common to use biological acellular dermal and synthetic matrices in combination with a tissue expander or an implant. The aim of this systematic review was to examine differences in recurrence of cancer, impact on oncological treatment, health related quality of life, complications and aesthetic outcome between matrix and no matrix in immediate breast reconstruction. Systematic searches, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed according to predetermined criteria. Fifty-one studies were eligible and included in the review. The certainty of evidence for overall complication rate and implant loss is low (GRADE ⊕⊕□ □). The certainty of evidence for delay of adjuvant treatment, implant loss, infection, capsular contraction and aesthetic outcome is very low (GRADE ⊕□ □ □). No study reported data on recurrence of cancer or health related quality of life. In conclusion, there is a lack of high quality studies that compare the use of matrix with no matrix in immediate breast reconstruction. Specifically, there are no data on risk of recurrence of cancer, delay of adjuvant treatment and Health related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition, there is a risk of bias in many studies. It is often unclear what complications have been included and how they have been diagnosed, and how and when capsular contracture and aesthetic outcome have been evaluated. Controlled trials that further analyse the impact of radiotherapy, type of matrix and type of procedure (one or two stages) are necessary.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Keyword

aceullar dermal matrix
ADM
Breast reconstruction
implant
matrix
mesh
systematic review
tissue expander

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view