SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/273314"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/273314" > “Just Carbon”: Idea...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

“Just Carbon”: Ideas About Graphene Risks by Graphene Researchers and Innovation Advisors

Arvidsson, Rickard, 1984 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Boholm, Max, 1982 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI),University of Gothenburg
Johansson, Mikael, 1969 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI),University of Gothenburg
show more...
Lindh de Montoya, Monica, 1953 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI),University of Gothenburg
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-10-22
2018
English.
In: NanoEthics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1871-4757 .- 1871-4765. ; 12:3, s. 199-210
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • © 2018, The Author(s). Graphene is a nanomaterial with many promising and innovative applications, yet early studies indicate that graphene may pose risks to humans and the environment. According to ideas of responsible research and innovation, all relevant actors should strive to reduce risks related to technological innovations. Through semi-structured interviews, we investigated the idea of graphene as a risk (or not) held by two types of key actors: graphene researchers and innovation advisors at universities, where the latter are facilitating the movement of graphene from the laboratory to the marketplace. The most common idea found is that graphene is not a risk due to, e.g., low toxicity, low amounts produced/used, and its similarity to harmless materials (being “just carbon”). However, some researchers and advisors also say that graphene is a risk, e.g., under certain conditions or due to a lack of risk-related information. We explain the co-existence of these seemingly contradictory ideas through (1) the semantic ambiguity of the word risk and (2) a risk/no-risk rhetoric, where risks are mentioned rhetorically only to be disregarded as manageable or negligible. We suggest that some of the ideas held by the researchers and innovation advisors constitute a challenge to responsible research and innovation regarding graphene. At the same time, we acknowledge the dilemma that the discourse of responsible innovation creates for the actors: denying graphene risks makes them irresponsible due to a lack of risk awareness, while affirming graphene risks makes them irresponsible due to their everyday engagement in graphene development. We therefore recommend more research into what researchers and innovation advisors should do in practice in order to qualify as responsible.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Nanoteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Nano-technology (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Sociologi -- Socialantropologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Sociology -- Social Anthropology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

ELSA
Nanomaterial
Responsible research and innovation
Risk association
Safety
ELSA

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

  • NanoEthics (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view