Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/280919" >
The 6S Dialogue Too...
-
Henoch, Ingela,1956Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa,Institute of Health and Care Sciences
(author)
The 6S Dialogue Tool to Facilitate Person-centered Palliative Care
- Article/chapterEnglish2019
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/280919
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/280919URI
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/287619URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319844405DOI
Supplementary language notes
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:kon swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
Background: Palliative care must be planned in accordance with patients’ needs, beliefs and preferences. The 6S person-centered palliative care model aims to co-create care together with patient and family in order to achieve good quality palliative care and a peaceful death for patients. The model includes six concepts that will facilitate to plan a person-centered care for patients in palliative care. The concepts are Self-image, Symptom relief, Self-determination, Social relationships, Synthesis, and Strategies. The 6S Dialogue Tool was elaborated to concretize the concepts. Aim: To explore if the 6S Dialogue Tool covers the meaning of the S-concepts in the 6S person-centered palliative care model. Methods: This is a qualitative study where data was collected with structured questions and patients responded in an open-ended format to the 15 questions in the 6S Dialogue Tool. Forty-six patients in palliative care services in Sweden responded to the 6S Dialogue Tool from May 2015 to August 2016. Responses were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Results: Six categories related to the 6S concepts were formulated: Selfimage was illustrated of Maintaining everyday life, Symptom relief was related to Challenges in everyday life, Self-determination concerned Maintaining control, Social relations was illustrated by Maintaining selected relations, Synthesis was related to Appraisal of life, and Strategies was illustrated by Appraisal of future. Conclusion: The responses to the 6S Dialogue Tool questions illuminated the intent and meaning of the 6S-concepts. The 6S Dialogue Tool questions are suitable for obtaining patients’ preferences and could be used as an approach in palliative care. Nurses should integrate both 6S-concepts and questions in their approach to obtain the patient’s own view of the situation and make it possible to co-create palliative care in dialogue with the patient and improve the possibilities for patients to have an appropriate death.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Österlind, Jane
(author)
-
Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:Palliative Medicine : A Multiprofessional Journal: SAGE Publications0269-21631477-030X
-
In:16th Congress of the European Association for Palliative (EAPC) in Berlin, 2019-05-23–25. Palliative Medicine , 33(1), P01-085: SAGE Publications
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database