SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/286864"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/286864" > Mean systemic filli...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Möller, Per WernerGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för anestesiologi och intensivvård,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care (author)

Mean systemic filling pressure - from Guyton to the ICU, and back again

  • BookEnglish2019

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Göteborgs universitet,2019

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/286864
  • ISBN:9789178332328
  • 2077/57739hdl
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/286864URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:vet swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:dok swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Introduction: Mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) is the equilibrated vascular pressure at zero flow. Venous return (VR) driving pressure (VRdP) is the difference between MSFP and right atrial pressure (RAP). In clinical research, MSFP can be estimated: MSFPinsp_hold is the zero-flow extrapolation of RAP-cardiac output data-pairs from inspiratory hold maneuvers; MSFPa is a dynamic analogue computed from clinically available hemodynamics. However, results are controversial and fundamental concepts of VR physiology are questioned. We aimed to test experimentally the concept of VRdP in dynamic conditions and validate estimates of MSFP against zero-flow measurements. Methods: We compared estimates of MSFP against zero-flow measurements from right atrial balloon occlusion (MSFPRAO), or from intermittently paused venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), in three porcine models exposed to changing blood volumes and vasoconstriction. Results: Changes in RAP resulted in immediate and directionally opposite changes in VR. Temporary VR and ECMO flow imbalance resulted in dynamically changing VRdP and RAP. In euvolemia, MSFP was increased by increased airway pressure. A moderate increase in positive end-expiratory pressure increased RAP, MSFPRAO and VRdP. Resistance to VR did not change. Changing blood volume led to concordant changes in RAP, MSFPRAO, VRdP and flow. Vasoconstriction and volume expansion increased MSFP and maximum achievable ECMO flow with similar effects on oxygen delivery. MSFPinsp_hold overestimated MSFPRAO in euvolemia due to flow restoration predominantly occurring in the inferior vena cava. Methods for MSFP estimation had an accuracy that was dependent on volume status. All methods tracked changes in the reference method concordantly. However, with the possible exception of MSFPa, the bias was clinically unacceptable. Conclusion: If pressure effects from volume shifts are accounted for, the concept of VRdP is valid also during dynamic conditions. VR physiology can explain the responses of volume expansion and vasoconstriction on venoarterial ECMO flow. Inspiratory hold maneuvers are unsuitable for the estimation of MSFP due to clinically significant bias.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för anestesiologi och intensivvård (creator_code:org_t)

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Möller, Per Wern ...
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Basic Medicine
and Physiology
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view