Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/292530" >
Timing of hip hemia...
Timing of hip hemiarthroplasty and the influence on prosthetic joint infection.
-
Horner, Nolan S (author)
-
Grønhaug Larsen, Kirsten M (author)
-
- Svantesson, Eleonor (author)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för ortopedi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics
-
show more...
-
- Samuelsson, Kristian, 1977 (author)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för ortopedi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics
-
Ayeni, Olufemi R (author)
-
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik (author)
-
Östman, Bengt (author)
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2020-03-12
- 2020
- English.
-
In: PloS one. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 15:3
- Related links:
-
https://journals.plo...
-
show more...
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Previous research suggested that patients have increased risk of infection with increased time from presentation with a femoral neck fracture to treatment with a hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA). The purpose of this study was to determine if rates of prosthetic joint infections within 3 months of surgery was affected by the time from patient presentation with a femoral neck fracture to the time of treatment with HHA.Acute hip fractures treated with HHA between 2005 and 2017 at three centres in Norway were enrolled in the study. Multi-trauma patients were excluded. Univariable analysis was performed to determine any significant effect of pre-operative waiting time on infection rate. Two pre-planned analyses dichotomizing pre-operative waiting time cut-offs were performed.There were 2300 patients with an average age of 82 (range, 48-100) years included of which 3.4% experienced a prosthetic joint infection within 3 months. The primary analysis found no significant difference in infection rate depending on time to surgery (OR = 1.06 (95% CI 0.94-1.20, p = 0.33)). The secondary analyses showed no significant differences in infection rates when comparing pre-operative waiting time of <24 hours vs ≥24 hours (OR = 0.92 (95% CI 0.58-1.46, p = 0.73)) and <48 hours vs ≥48 hours (OR = 1.39 (95% CI 0.81-2.38, p = 0.23)).Based off of a large retrospective Norwegian database of hip fractures there did not appear to be a significant difference in infection rate based on pre-operative wait time to surgery.
Subject headings
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Ortopedi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Orthopaedics (hsv//eng)
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
-
PloS one
(Search for host publication in LIBRIS)
To the university's database