SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/302802"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/302802" > Quantifying Colocal...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Quantifying Colocalization: the Case for Discarding the Manders Overlap Coefficient.

Adler, Jeremy (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för biomedicin, avdelningen för medicinsk kemi och cellbiologi,Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Cell Biology
Parmryd, Ingela (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för biomedicin, avdelningen för medicinsk kemi och cellbiologi,Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Cell Biology
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-03-30
2021
English.
In: Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology. - : Wiley. - 1552-4930. ; 99:9, s. 910-920
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Colocalization measurements aim to characterize the relative distribution of two molecules within a biologically relevant area. It is efficient to measure two distinct features, co-occurrence, the extent to which the molecules appear together, and correlation, how well variations in concentration of the two molecules match. The Manders overlap coefficient (MOC) appears in most colocalization software but the literature contains three interpretations of its measurements: a) co-occurrence, b) correlation or c) a combination of both. This is surprising given the simplicity of the underlying equation. Testing shows that the MOC responds both to changes in co-occurrence and to changes in correlation. Further testing reveals that different distributions of intensity (Gaussian, gamma, uniform, exponential) dramatically alter the balance between the contribution from co-occurrence and correlation. It follows that the MOC's ability to differentiate between different patterns of colocalization is very limited, since any value is compatible with widely differing combinations of co-occurrence, correlation and intensity distribution. To characterize colocalization we recommend reporting both co-occurrence and correlation, using coefficients specific for each attribute. Since the MOC has no clear role in the measurement of colocalization and causes considerable confusion, we conclude that it should be discarded. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Cell- och molekylärbiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Cell and Molecular Biology (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Cellbiologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Cell Biology (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Biofysik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Biophysics (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Adler, Jeremy
Parmryd, Ingela
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Basic Medicine
and Cell and Molecul ...
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Biological Scien ...
and Cell Biology
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Biological Scien ...
and Biophysics
Articles in the publication
Cytometry. Part ...
Cytometry Part A
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view