SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/319016"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/319016" > Automated classific...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Automated classification of PET-CT lesions in lung cancer: An independent validation study

Borrelli, P. (author)
Gongora, J. L. L. (author)
Kaboteh, R. (author)
show more...
Enqvist, O. (author)
Edenbrandt, Lars, 1957 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för molekylär och klinisk medicin,Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-07-07
2022
English.
In: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. - : Wiley. - 1475-0961 .- 1475-097X. ; 42:5, s. 327-332
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Introduction Recently, a tool called the positron emission tomography (PET)-assisted reporting system (PARS) was developed and presented to classify lesions in PET/computed tomography (CT) studies in patients with lung cancer or lymphoma. The aim of this study was to validate PARS with an independent group of lung-cancer patients using manual lesion segmentations as a reference standard, as well as to evaluate the association between PARS-based measurements and overall survival (OS). Methods This study retrospectively included 115 patients who had undergone clinically indicated (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT due to suspected or known lung cancer. The patients had a median age of 66 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 61-72 years). Segmentations were made manually by visual inspection in a consensus reading by two nuclear medicine specialists and used as a reference. The research prototype PARS was used to automatically analyse all the PET/CT studies. The PET foci classified as suspicious by PARS were compared with the manual segmentations. No manual corrections were applied. Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was calculated based on the manual and PARS-based lung-tumour segmentations. Associations between TLG and OS were investigated using Cox analysis. Results PARS showed sensitivities for lung tumours of 55.6% per lesion and 80.2% per patient. Both manual and PARS TLG were significantly associated with OS. Conclusion Automatically calculated TLG by PARS contains prognostic information comparable to manually measured TLG in patients with known or suspected lung cancer. The low sensitivity at both the lesion and patient levels makes the present version of PARS less useful to support clinical reading, reporting and staging.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Fysiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Physiology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

artificial intelligence
computer-based methods
image analysis
quantification
survival analysis
bone-scan index
reproducibility
Physiology

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Borrelli, P.
Gongora, J. L. L ...
Kaboteh, R.
Enqvist, O.
Edenbrandt, Lars ...
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Basic Medicine
and Physiology
Articles in the publication
Clinical Physiol ...
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view