SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/338495"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/338495" > A Provider-Facing D...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

A Provider-Facing Decision Support Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Pilot Study

Carlsson, Sigrid, 1982 (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för urologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Urology,Urologisk cancerforskning, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Urological cancer, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,Sahlgrenska Academy
Preston, Mark A. (author)
Harvard Medical School
Vickers, Andrew (author)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
show more...
Malhotra, Deepak (author)
Harvard Business School
Ehdaie, Behfar (author)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Healey, Michael J. (author)
Harvard Medical School
Kibel, Adam S. (author)
Harvard Medical School
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
English.
In: APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS. - 1869-0327. ; 15:02, s. 274-281
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objectives Our objective was to pilot test an electronic health record-embedded decision support tool to facilitate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening discussions in the primary care setting. Methods We pilot-tested a novel decision support tool that was used by 10 primary care physicians (PCPs) for 6 months, followed by a survey. The tool comprised (1) a risk-stratified algorithm, (2) a tool for facilitating shared decision-making (Simple Schema), (3) three best practice advisories (BPAs: <45, 45-75, and >75 years), and (4) a health maintenance module for scheduling automated reminders about PSA rescreening. Results All PCPs found the tool feasible, acceptable, and clear to use. Eight out of ten PCPs reported that the tool made PSA screening conversations somewhat or much easier. Before using the tool, 70% of PCPs felt confident in their ability to discuss PSA screening with their patient, and this improved to 100% after the tool was used by PCPs for 6 months. PCPs found the BPAs for eligible (45-75 years) and older men (>75 years) more useful than the BPA for younger men (<45 years). Among the 10 PCPs, 60% found the Simple Schema to be very useful, and 50% found the health maintenance module to be extremely or very useful. Most PCPs reported the components of the tool to be at least somewhat useful, with 10% finding them to be very burdensome. Conclusion We demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the tool, which is notable given the marked low acceptance of existing tools. All PCPs reported that they would consider continuing to use the tool in their clinic and were likely or very likely to recommend the tool to a colleague.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

prostate cancer screening
clinical decision support
electronic health record
pilot study
informatics
concordant care

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view