SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/339371"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/339371" > The impact of diffe...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

The impact of different fixatives on immunostaining of lung adenocarcinomas in pleural effusion cell blocks

Mansour, Mohammed S. I. (author)
Pettersson, Louise (author)
Seidal, Tomas (author)
show more...
Strömberg, Ulf, 1964 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för samhällsmedicin och folkhälsa,Institute of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine
Mager, Ulrich (author)
Ali, Lana (author)
Kumbaric, Sana (author)
Hejny, Kim (author)
Taheri-Eilagh, Fereshteh (author)
Mufti, Joudy (author)
Nakdali, Dawla (author)
Brunnstrom, Hans (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
English.
In: CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY. - 1934-662X .- 1934-6638.
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: Cell blocks (CBs) are widely used for biomarker analyses such as immunostaining. Although immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues is standardized, there are multiple preparation methods and fixatives for cytology. Our objective was to investigate the effect of different common fixatives on the immunoreactivity of pleural effusion CBs with metastatic lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: This prospective study included 24 malignant pleural effusions from different patients with lung adenocarcinoma. From each case, four identical CBs were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, PreservCyt, CytoLyt, and CytoRich Red (only 17 of the cases), respectively. Samples containing <100 malignant cells were excluded. All CBs were stained with thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1; clones 8G7G3/1 and SPT24), napsin A, claudin 4, CEA, CK7, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; clones BS14, Ber-Ep4, and MOC-31). The fraction and intensity of stained cells were evaluated. Results: Of the investigated markers, a significant difference in staining proportion was seen for TTF-1 clone 8G7G3/1 and EpCAM clone MOC-31, especially with cases being negative in CytoLyt (33.3% and 83.3% positive, respectively) and PreservCyt (62.5% and 83.3%) whereas being positive in CytoRich Red (76.5% and 94.1%) and formalin (both 95.8%). A significantly weaker intensity of staining was seen for all alcohol-based fixatives compared to formalin for TTF-1 clone 8G7G3/1, napsin A, and EpCAM clone MOC-31, whereas EpCAM clone Ber-Ep4 was significantly weaker only in PreservCyt compared with formalin. Conclusions: Immunocytochemical expression and concordance with formalin-fixed CBs differ depending on the used fixative as well as the antibody and clone, warranting investigation of the reliability of each biomarker for non-formalin-fixed cytology.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Cell- och molekylärbiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Cell and Molecular Biology (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

cytology
CytoLyt
CytoRich Red
fixation
formalin
immunocytochemistry
PreservCyt

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view