SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/41326"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/41326" > Power for detecting...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci

Ryman, N. (author)
Palm, S. (author)
André, Carl, 1958 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för marin ekologi,Department of Marine Ecology
show more...
Carvalho, Gary R. (author)
Dahlgren, Thomas G., 1963 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Zoologiska institutionen,Institutionen för marin ekologi, Tjärnö marinbiologiska laboratorium,Department of Zoology,Department of Marine Ecology, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory
Jorde, P. E. (author)
Laikre, L. (author)
Larsson, L. C. (author)
Palme, A. (author)
Ruzzante, D. E. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2006
2006
English.
In: Molecular Ecology. - 0962-1083. ; 15:8, s. 2031-2045
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Information on statistical power is critical when planning investigations and evaluating empirical data, but actual power estimates are rarely presented in population genetic studies. We used computer simulations to assess and evaluate power when testing for genetic differentiation at multiple loci through combining test statistics or P values obtained by four different statistical approaches, viz. Pearson's chi-square, the log-likelihood ratio G-test, Fisher's exact test, and an F-ST-based permutation test. Factors considered in the comparisons include the number of samples, their size, and the number and type of genetic marker loci. It is shown that power for detecting divergence may be substantial for frequently used sample sizes and sets of markers, also at quite low levels of differentiation. The choice of statistical method may be critical, though. For multi-allelic loci such as microsatellites, combining exact P values using Fisher's method is robust and generally provides a high resolving power. In contrast, for few-allele loci (e.g. allozymes and single nucleotide polymorphisms) and when making pairwise sample comparisons, this approach may yield a remarkably low power. In such situations chi-square typically represents a better alternative. The G-test without Williams's correction frequently tends to provide an unduly high proportion of false significances, and results from this test should be interpreted with great care. Our results are not confined to population genetic analyses but applicable to contingency testing in general.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Ekologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Ecology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

chi-square
fisher's exact test
fisher's method
genetic differentiation
g-test
statistical power
differentiation
conservation
populations
distances
evolution
patterns
program
tests

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view