SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/45610"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/45610" > Disciplinarity and ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Disciplinarity and climate change : An analysis of IPCC's assessment of the international climate change research

Bjurström, Andreas, 1974 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för omvärldsstudier av människans villkor, avdelningen för humanekologi,Department of Environmental and Regional Studies of the Human Condition, Human Ecology Section
 (creator_code:org_t)
2005
2005
English.
In: 20th Anniversary Conference of the Society for Human Ecology, Salt Lake City, USA.
  • Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the references used in the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC is one of the most well-known and influential institutions in the climate change arena. The formal role of IPCC is to assess comprehensive and objective policy-relevant scientific knowledge to serve but not guide the politics of climate change. This however is a traditional view of science as objective knowledge producer separated from values, power and interests - a view questioned in recent social studies of science, among others. In contrast to this science can be seen as actively participating in discourses about the way we view climate change, value it as a environmental problem, and how resulting problems should be solved. IPCC is seen not as an objective and neutral institution but as a boundary organisation “translating” between the scientific and political community of the climate change regime, influencing science and politics of climate change. This paper uses quantitative analysis to show which disciplines are dominating the IPCC assessment. The underlaying assumption is that different disciplines have different knowledge, views and values about climate change. The main conclusion is that natural scientists, especially climatologists are dominating the assessment, quantitatively, but also structurally. The next IPCC assessment (climate change 2007) should gain by a closer collaboration and integration between natural and social science and a broader view of and stronger position for the social sciences.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Övrig annan samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap -- Klimatforskning (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences -- Climate Research (hsv//eng)

Keyword

climate change
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
disciplinarity
science studies

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
kon (subject category)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Bjurström, Andre ...
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Other Social Sci ...
and Other Social Sci ...
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Earth and Relate ...
and Climate Research
Articles in the publication
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view