SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/50102"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/50102" > Resource utilizatio...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Resource utilization and costs in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme

McMurray, J. J. (author)
Andersson, F. L. (author)
Stewart, S. (author)
show more...
Svensson, K. (author)
Solal, A. C. (author)
Dietz, R. (author)
Vanhaecke, J. (author)
van Veldhuisen, D. J. (author)
Ostergren, J. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Granger, C. B. (author)
Yusuf, S. (author)
Pfeffer, M. A. (author)
Swedberg, Karl, 1944 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för akut och kardiovaskulär medicin,Institute of Medicine, Department of Emergeny and Cardiovascular Medicine
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2005-10-24
2006
English.
In: European heart journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 27:12, s. 1447-58
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • AIMS: More treatments are needed to improve clinical outcomes in chronic heart failure (HF). It is, however, important that treatments for a condition as common as HF are affordable. We have carried out a prospective economic analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with NYHA class II-IV HF and LVEF < or =0.40 were randomized to CHARM-Alternative if intolerant of an ACE-inhibitor or to CHARM-Added if taking an ACE-inhibitor. Patients with a LVEF >0.40 were randomized in CHARM-Preserved. Each trial compared the effect of candesartan to placebo on the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Detailed information was prospectively collected on hospital admissions, procedures/operations and drugs. A cost-consequence analysis was performed for France, Germany and the UK for CHARM-Overall and a cost-effectiveness analysis for the low LVEF trials. The cost of candesartan was substantially offset by a reduction in hospital admissions, especially for HF. In the cost-consequence analysis, candesartan was cost-saving in most scenarios for CHARM-Alternative and Added but the marginal annual net cost per patient was upto 372 euros per year in CHARM-Preserved, in which candesartan did not reduce the primary outcome significantly. In the cost-effectiveness analysis of patients with a LVEF < or = 0.40, candesartan was cost-saving in some scenarios and in the others the maximum cost per life year gained was 3881 euros. CONCLUSION: Candesartan improves functional class, reduces the risk of hospital admission, and increases survival in patients with a HF and a LVEF < or =0.40 at an acceptable cost.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kardiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/*economics/therapeutic use
Benzimidazoles/*economics/therapeutic use
Cardiac Pacing
Artificial/statistics & numerical data
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Drug Costs
Heart Failure
Congestive/*drug therapy/economics/mortality
Hospital Costs
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
Humans
Risk Factors
Survival Analysis
Tetrazoles/*economics/therapeutic use
Thoracic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view