SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/52203"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/52203" > Patient perception ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Patient perception of the effect of treatment with candesartan in heart failure. Results of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme

O'Meara, E. (author)
Lewis, E. (author)
Granger, C. (author)
show more...
Dunlap, M. E. (author)
McKelvie, R. S. (author)
Probstfield, J. L. (author)
Young, J. B. (author)
Michelson, E. L. (author)
Ostergren, J. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Carlsson, J. (author)
Olofsson, B. (author)
McMurray, J. (author)
Yusuf, S. (author)
Swedberg, Karl, 1944 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Hjärt-kärlinstitutionen,Cardiovascular Institute
Pfeffer, M. A. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2005-05-28
2005
English.
In: European journal of heart failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842. ; 7:4, s. 650-6
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • AIMS: To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on patients' perception of symptoms, using the McMaster Overall treatment evaluation (OTE), in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic CHF, randomised in the CHARM Programme in North America (n=2498), were studied. OTE was assessed at baseline, at 6, 14 and 26 months and the patient's final or closing visit. Patient's status was classified as "improved (score +1 to +7)", "unchanged (score 0)" or "deteriorated (score -1 to -7)" at the end of the study compared to baseline. Both a simple "last visit carried forward" (LVCF) analysis and "worst rank carried forward" (WRCF) analysis (where patients who died were allocated the worst OTE score) were used. In the LVCF analysis, compared to placebo, more candesartan patients improved (37.7% versus 33.5%) and fewer worsened (10.8% versus 12.0%) in OTE (p=0.017). The WRCF analysis also showed better overall OTE scores with candesartan compared to placebo (p=0.029). There was no heterogeneity in the response to candesartan between the CHARM component trials or across four exploratory sub-groups (age, sex, NYHA class and beta-blocker). CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan was shown to be better than placebo, when using the McMaster OTE to measure patient perception of treatment. More patients treated with candesartan reported improvement and fewer reported deterioration. This benefit was obtained when candesartan was added to extensive background therapy and is consistent with the benefits of candesartan on NYHA class, hospital admission for worsening heart failure and mortality.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kardiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Aged
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/*therapeutic use
Benzimidazoles/*therapeutic use
Female
Health Status Indicators
Heart Failure
Congestive/*drug therapy
Humans
Male
Patient Satisfaction
*Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Randomized Controlled Trials
Tetrazoles/*therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view